undamentalytics Newsletter

Bakkt vs White Mountains Insurance Group

White Mountains Insurance Group is the larger business, with $3.73bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $2.34bn for Bakkt (1.6 times as much). White Mountains Insurance Group grew faster (66.8% against -32.1%). White Mountains Insurance Group kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 29.6% against -4.6%.

Latest fiscal yearBakktBKKT, 2025White Mountains Insurance GroupWTM, 2025
Revenue $2.34bn $3.73bn
Revenue growth -32.1% 66.8%
Net income −$107m $1.11bn
Operating margin — —
Net margin -4.6% 29.6%
Return on equity -146.2% 22.3%
Free cash flow −$153m —
Cash $27.0m $186m
Total debt $0 $852m
Debt to equity — 15.7%
Dividend per share — $1.00
Dividend yield — 0.0%
Share buybacks — $203m
Employees 48 1,648
Market value $210m $5.50bn
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — 77 (Strong)
Insider trades, 12 months 5 buys, 21 sales 0 buys, 4 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.