An article is published only if it passes all of the following tests:

  • Originality. It contains analysis beyond readily available headline information.
  • Usefulness. It answers a real investor question.
  • Evidence. Conclusions are supported by data shown in the article.
  • Accuracy. Numeric claims are verified against deterministically computed facts.
  • Differentiation. There is a clear reason to read it instead of existing coverage.
  • Search intent. It satisfies an identified information need.
  • Readability. An intelligent non-specialist investor can understand it.
  • Balance. It acknowledges the strongest reasonable alternative interpretation.
  • Sourcing. Important claims trace to named primary sources.

Bylines and independence

Research is published as Fundamentalytics Research. We do not invent analyst personas. We do not accept payment for coverage, and we do not publish sponsored content presented as research.

No investment advice

We publish observations and analysis about companies' reported financials. We never make personalised recommendations, and signals produced by our systems are descriptions of data, not advice. See the disclaimer.

How articles are produced

Our figures come from companies' own SEC filings and are computed by our software, not typed by hand. Drafts are written with the help of an AI model working from those figures. Before anything is published, every number in the text is checked automatically against the underlying filing data, and a member of the editorial team reads and approves the article. Anything that fails a check is rejected or rewritten.

What we draw on

Figures come from SEC filings: quarterly and annual reports, earnings releases and other company announcements filed on Form 8-K. For what a company is doing and saying, we also read its own newsroom and the press releases it issues through newswires. Analysts' consensus estimates are third-party data and are labelled as such wherever they appear. Media coverage and online discussion tell us what the market is debating; we attribute and link it, test it against the filings, and never treat a reported claim as fact or use a figure that appears only in a headline.

Updates over duplicates

When new filings change the picture, we update the existing article (with a visible updated date) rather than publishing a near-duplicate. URLs are stable.

Corrections

If we get something wrong, we correct the article and say so in a dated note at the top of the page, explaining what changed. Company data pages are recalculated from filings every day, and a daily audit checks them against the source documents. To report an error, reply to any email we send or use the contact details on the about page.