undamentalytics Newsletter

Great Elm Group vs Nakamoto

Great Elm Group is the larger business, with $27.8m of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $1.8m for Nakamoto (15.3 times as much). Great Elm Group grew faster (70.2% against -33.0%). Great Elm Group kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -127.6% against -2867.6%.

Latest fiscal yearGreat Elm GroupGEG, 2026NakamotoNAKA, 2025
Revenue $27.8m $1.8m
Revenue growth 70.2% -33.0%
Net income −$35.4m −$52.2m
Operating margin -50.4% —
Net margin -127.6% -2867.6%
Return on equity -63.8% -20.2%
Free cash flow $15.7m −$23.5m
Cash $53.5m $21.1m
Total debt $36.5m —
Debt to equity 89.4% —
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks $6.8m $320,404
Employees 52 65
Market value $64.3m $101m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — —
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 12 buys, 1 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.