undamentalytics Newsletter

Helmerich & Payne vs Patterson UTI Energy

Patterson UTI Energy is the larger business, with $4.83bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.75bn for Helmerich & Payne (1.3 times as much). Helmerich & Payne grew faster (35.9% against -10.3%). Patterson UTI Energy kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -1.9% against -4.4%. Patterson UTI Energy carries less debt relative to equity (38.1% against 73.6%).

Latest fiscal yearHelmerich & PayneHP, 2025Patterson UTI EnergyPTEN, 2025
Revenue $3.75bn $4.83bn
Revenue growth 35.9% -10.3%
Net income −$164m −$93.6m
Operating margin 0.1% -0.8%
Net margin -4.4% -1.9%
Return on equity -5.7% -2.8%
Free cash flow $117m $372m
Cash $197m $419m
Total debt $2.08bn $1.23bn
Debt to equity 73.6% 38.1%
Dividend per share — $0.32
Dividend yield 2.6% 3.2%
Share buybacks $0 $69.6m
Employees — 7,900
Market value $3.88bn $4.48bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Below our value range
Moat score 53 (Moderate) 36 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 14 sales 0 buys, 18 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.