undamentalytics Newsletter

QT Imaging Holdings vs Stereotaxis

Stereotaxis is the larger business, with $32.4m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $18.9m for QT Imaging Holdings (1.7 times as much). QT Imaging Holdings grew faster (287.9% against 20.3%). Stereotaxis kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -66.8% against -111.4%.

Latest fiscal yearQT Imaging HoldingsQTI, 2025StereotaxisSTXS, 2025
Revenue $18.9m $32.4m
Revenue growth 287.9% 20.3%
Net income −$21.1m −$21.6m
Operating margin -23.4% —
Net margin -111.4% -66.8%
Return on equity — —
Free cash flow −$9.1m −$13.8m
Cash $10.4m $13.4m
Total debt $10.1m $0
Debt to equity 156.9% —
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — 0.0%
Share buybacks — —
Employees 32 131
Market value $30.2m $81.6m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — 22 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 1 buys, 0 sales 2 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.