undamentalytics Newsletter

Rbs Partners, L.P.: insider trades

10% owner at 3 companies we cover. 6 open-market purchases and 15 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from March 3, 2010 to March 16, 2021.

Would copying Rbs Partners, L.P.’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 6 purchases have 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on March 4, 2010 into $17,627 by November 2, 2026, +3.5% a year. The copy held shares only 24% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $22,350, +5.0% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $90,213, +14.1% a year). Beta against the index was 0.14. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was +23.2% against the S&P 500 (median +44.5%), and 67% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was +34.0%. After their sales, the shares moved −7.0% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 53% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$50.0k$100k 201020122014201620182020202220242026 $90.2k$22.4k$17.6k
Copying Rbs Partners, L.P.S&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Rbs Partners, L.P.’s open-market purchases from March 4, 2010, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
+3.5%
S&P 500, same days invested
+5.0% (held throughout +14.1%)
Time in shares
24%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
0.19 (0.77)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−56% (−34%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.14
Purchases copied
6

Trade by trade

Rbs Partners, L.P.: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 6 +5.6% +7.3% 67% 4 0.51 0.65 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 6 months after the report 6 +19.8% +24.0% 67% 4 0.92 0.43 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the report 6 +23.2% +44.5% 67% 4 0.27 0.80 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 6 +34.0% +61.1% 67% 4 0.44 0.69 No reliable evidence
Sales, 3 months after the report 15 +1.9% +2.6% 27% 6 0.54 0.61 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 15 −7.0% −0.1% 53% 6 −0.88 0.42 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 15 −7.1% −4.0% 53% 6 −0.90 0.41 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
AutoZone AZO —08July 23, 2010January 24, 2012
Lands' END, Inc. LE —52September 30, 2015March 16, 2021
Autonation, Inc. AN —15March 3, 2010January 12, 2021

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
March 16, 2021March 12, 2021 LE Sale $139,286 −19.7%−64.8%−64.3%
February 16, 2021February 11, 2021 LE Sale $2,133,263 −28.5%−56.8%−59.0%
January 12, 2021January 8, 2021 AN Sale $7,588,092 +18.7%+24.7%+26.6%
November 9, 2017November 7, 2017 LE Purchase $199,313 +29.2%+30.5%+58.7%
September 5, 2017August 31, 2017 LE Purchase $9,433,886 +4.3%+66.8%+92.0%
July 26, 2017July 24, 2017 LE Purchase $23,874,883 −7.9%+64.0%+69.7%
June 13, 2016June 9, 2016 LE Purchase $4,657,852 +10.4%−19.5%−18.5%
September 30, 2015September 28, 2015 LE Purchase $6,887,481 −19.6%−61.1%−61.4%
June 22, 2015June 18, 2015 AN Sale $47,560,287 +2.3%−25.3%−23.9%
May 12, 2015May 8, 2015 AN Sale $33,032,476 −3.1%−25.2%−22.8%
November 20, 2013November 18, 2013 AN Sale $552,168 +2.6%+1.2%+1.7%
October 30, 2013October 30, 2013 AN Sale $227,346 +0.2%+1.8%+1.2%
January 24, 2012January 20, 2012 AZO Sale $104,120,329 +4.4%−9.7%−13.0%
January 19, 2012January 17, 2012 AZO Sale $243,155,663 +5.0%−13.0%−15.9%
December 29, 2011December 27, 2011 AZO Sale $71,965,702 +3.0%−9.1%−7.6%
November 8, 2011November 4, 2011 AZO Sale $24,846,207 −1.0%+0.3%+4.5%
October 26, 2011October 24, 2011 AZO Sale $95,958,259 +2.3%−0.1%−4.0%
June 24, 2011June 22, 2011 AZO Sale $75,902,533 +20.4%+23.2%+25.2%
June 3, 2011June 1, 2011 AZO Sale $19,150,881 +17.0%+30.6%+27.9%
July 23, 2010July 21, 2010 AZO Sale $69,304,090 +4.0%+16.7%+16.9%
March 3, 2010March 1, 2010 AN Purchase $1,438,233 +17.2%+58.5%+63.5%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Rbs Partners, L.P. traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.