undamentalytics Newsletter

Marks Michael E: insider trades

Director at 3 companies we cover. 7 open-market purchases and 14 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from March 1, 2010 to December 3, 2018.

Would copying Marks Michael E’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 7 purchases have 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on March 2, 2010 into $8,010 by November 2, 2026, −1.3% a year. The copy held shares only 35% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $23,688, +5.3% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $90,567, +14.2% a year). Beta against the index was 0.40. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was −16.4% against the S&P 500 (median −23.9%), and 14% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was −12.7%. After their sales, the shares moved −37.0% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 86% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$50.0k$100k 201020122014201620182020202220242026 $90.6k$23.7k$8.0k
Copying Marks Michael ES&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Marks Michael E’s open-market purchases from March 2, 2010, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
−1.3%
S&P 500, same days invested
+5.3% (held throughout +14.2%)
Time in shares
35%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
−0.07 (0.77)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−57% (−34%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.40
Purchases copied
7

Trade by trade

Marks Michael E: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 7 −11.0% −10.5% 0% 6 −4.62 0.006 Strong evidence: behind
Purchases, 6 months after the report 7 −13.2% −10.9% 0% 6 −3.49 0.018 Some evidence: behind
Purchases, 12 months after the report 7 −16.4% −23.9% 14% 6 −1.40 0.22 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 7 −12.7% −19.7% 29% 6 −1.15 0.30 No reliable evidence
Sales, 3 months after the report 14 +17.3% +17.9% 36% 5 1.12 0.33 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 14 −37.0% −47.3% 86% 5 −6.54 0.003 Some evidence: seller right
Sales, 12 months after the trade 14 −37.6% −40.2% 93% 5 −6.72 0.003 Some evidence: seller right

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Schlumberger SLB —72March 1, 2010December 3, 2018
Calix, Inc CALX —07March 30, 2010December 8, 2010
Gopro, Inc. GPRO —05July 1, 2014February 22, 2017

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
December 3, 2018October 26, 2017 SLB Purchase $1,016,960 −7.5%−31.9%−19.7%
September 7, 2018September 6, 2018 SLB Purchase $482,480 −21.3%−40.7%−42.1%
August 14, 2017August 11, 2017 SLB Purchase $513,600 −2.0%−15.3%−12.8%
February 22, 2017February 17, 2017 GPRO Sale $276,600 −13.0%−60.0%−57.5%
August 29, 2016August 29, 2016 SLB Sale $1,104,184 −2.1%−34.5%−34.1%
August 17, 2016August 15, 2016 GPRO Sale $623,200 −34.6%−53.3%−51.5%
August 28, 2015August 27, 2015 SLB Purchase $995,248 −5.8%−6.3%+1.1%
March 2, 2015February 25, 2015 GPRO Sale $8,361,650 +44.4%−63.9%−69.1%
December 4, 2014December 3, 2014 GPRO Sale $24,071,561 −45.4%−77.9%−75.2%
October 28, 2014October 27, 2014 SLB Purchase $300,918 −16.3%−24.9%−23.3%
July 1, 2014July 1, 2014 GPRO Sale $37,258,742 +119.4%+15.9%−0.9%
August 11, 2011August 11, 2011 SLB Purchase $201,420 −10.5%−23.9%−24.0%
December 8, 2010December 6, 2010 CALX Sale $996,587 +13.7%−60.2%−53.8%
December 6, 2010December 3, 2010 CALX Sale $202,322 +20.6%−54.9%−51.8%
December 3, 2010December 1, 2010 CALX Sale $4,672,400 +22.0%−53.8%−39.6%
November 29, 2010November 24, 2010 CALX Sale $122,720 +38.0%−41.3%−40.7%
November 15, 2010November 12, 2010 SLB Sale $266,675 +15.3%−3.8%−3.0%
November 15, 2010November 11, 2010 CALX Sale $262,847 +44.3%−36.8%−35.8%
November 3, 2010November 1, 2010 CALX Sale $1,240,000 +31.2%−30.4%−38.3%
March 30, 2010March 26, 2010 CALX Sale $4,273,139 −12.4%+36.5%+25.4%
March 1, 2010February 26, 2010 SLB Purchase $200,475 −13.6%+28.6%+32.1%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Marks Michael E traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.