undamentalytics Newsletter

Hobson Mellody L: insider trades

Director at 3 companies we cover. 13 open-market purchases and 7 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from February 1, 2011 to January 20, 2023.

Would copying Hobson Mellody L’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 13 purchases have 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on February 2, 2011 into $21,948 by November 2, 2026, +5.1% a year. The copy held shares only 45% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $23,704, +5.7% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $76,373, +13.8% a year). Beta against the index was 0.61. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was −5.7% against the S&P 500 (median −12.6%), and 31% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was −5.9%. After their sales, the shares moved +9.0% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 29% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$25.0k$50.0k$75.0k 20112013201520172019202120232025 $76.4k$23.7k$21.9k
Copying Hobson Mellody LS&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Hobson Mellody L’s open-market purchases from February 2, 2011, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
+5.1%
S&P 500, same days invested
+5.7% (held throughout +13.8%)
Time in shares
45%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
0.27 (0.75)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−44% (−34%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.61
Purchases copied
13

Trade by trade

Hobson Mellody L: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 13 −0.2% −1.6% 39% 8 −0.34 0.74 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 6 months after the report 13 −1.0% +1.4% 62% 8 −0.25 0.81 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the report 13 −5.7% −12.6% 31% 8 −0.21 0.84 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 13 −5.9% −10.1% 31% 8 −0.16 0.88 No reliable evidence
Sales, 3 months after the report 7 +2.5% +3.2% 29% 4 1.35 0.27 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 7 +9.0% +3.2% 29% 4 1.52 0.23 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 7 +8.2% +5.4% 43% 4 1.48 0.23 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
JPMorgan Chase JPM —100April 17, 2018January 20, 2023
Starbucks SBUX —35February 1, 2011September 16, 2022
The Estée Lauder Companies EL —02May 11, 2011March 9, 2012

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
January 20, 2023January 19, 2023 JPM Purchase $50,449 −0.1%+4.8%+3.6%
September 16, 2022September 15, 2022 SBUX Purchase $5,068,755 +8.8%−9.2%−8.8%
January 20, 2022January 19, 2022 JPM Purchase $100,286 −9.5%+5.7%+4.6%
April 19, 2021April 19, 2021 JPM Purchase $101,059 −4.1%−19.3%−20.6%
January 16, 2020January 15, 2020 JPM Purchase $1,991,294 −18.3%−12.6%−10.4%
October 24, 2019October 23, 2019 JPM Purchase $1,994,400 −1.6%−31.5%−31.9%
August 8, 2019August 8, 2019 JPM Purchase $2,000,362 +13.2%−22.4%−22.6%
April 18, 2019April 18, 2019 JPM Purchase $194,242 −1.8%−15.1%−15.6%
April 17, 2019April 16, 2019 JPM Purchase $1,998,360 −2.2%−15.6%−17.0%
October 19, 2018October 19, 2018 JPM Purchase $125,281 +1.0%+10.1%+8.9%
April 17, 2018April 16, 2018 JPM Purchase $1,998,900 −1.8%−2.6%−7.0%
January 29, 2015January 27, 2015 SBUX Sale $1,503,308 +9.2%+43.0%+37.4%
August 21, 2013August 19, 2013 SBUX Purchase $9,995,054 +3.2%−13.3%−10.1%
February 5, 2013February 1, 2013 SBUX Sale $1,823,680 +3.2%+11.0%+5.4%
June 13, 2012June 11, 2012 SBUX Sale $1,199,608 −11.2%+3.2%−1.0%
March 13, 2012March 9, 2012 SBUX Sale $1,209,780 +2.8%−4.0%−1.1%
March 9, 2012March 9, 2012 EL Sale $735,185 −4.5%−6.0%−4.1%
August 3, 2011August 1, 2011 SBUX Sale $1,281,615 +8.4%+2.3%+6.2%
May 11, 2011May 9, 2011 EL Sale $702,870 +9.6%+13.4%+14.4%
February 1, 2011January 28, 2011 SBUX Purchase $40,262 +10.3%+46.4%+50.1%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Hobson Mellody L traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.