undamentalytics Newsletter

Zucker Nehemia: insider trades

Chief executive at Ziff Davis, Inc. No open-market purchases and 19 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from May 19, 2010 to June 5, 2017.

What happened after Zucker Nehemia’s sales?

After their sales, the shares moved +0.4% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 63% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

Trade by trade

Zucker Nehemia: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 19 −1.8% −4.3% 58% 6 −1.09 0.32 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 19 +0.4% −11.0% 63% 6 −0.67 0.53 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 19 +0.3% −10.1% 63% 6 −0.70 0.52 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Ziff Davis, Inc. ZD Chief Executive Officer019May 19, 2010June 5, 2017

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
June 5, 2017June 1, 2017 ZD Sale $1,294,950 −15.0%−12.6%−14.8%
March 14, 2017March 13, 2017 ZD Sale $639,348 −1.3%−19.3%−18.1%
November 20, 2015November 18, 2015 ZD Sale $539,703 −4.6%−12.8%−13.1%
August 12, 2015August 10, 2015 ZD Sale $453,378 +8.3%−12.2%−12.4%
June 5, 2015June 3, 2015 ZD Sale $201,813 +8.4%+1.0%+1.2%
November 12, 2014November 7, 2014 ZD Sale $922,827 +16.7%+40.1%+38.8%
August 19, 2014August 19, 2014 ZD Sale $614,287 +1.5%+31.7%+32.0%
August 18, 2014August 15, 2014 ZD Sale $697,770 +0.6%+32.0%+30.9%
March 7, 2014March 5, 2014 ZD Sale $1,596,583 −8.4%+22.7%+22.0%
February 28, 2014February 26, 2014 ZD Sale $1,388,050 −12.2%+19.3%+20.2%
August 12, 2013August 7, 2009 ZD Sale $4,099,510 −18.4%−12.6%−14.4%
August 5, 2011August 3, 2011 ZD Sale $703,978 −8.5%−21.5%−10.1%
May 11, 2011May 10, 2011 ZD Sale $385,015 +10.5%−15.7%−16.0%
May 10, 2011May 6, 2011 ZD Sale $597,522 +11.3%−16.0%−14.7%
December 13, 2010December 10, 2010 ZD Sale $1,321,405 −10.1%−11.0%−11.8%
December 10, 2010December 8, 2010 ZD Sale $1,548,795 −9.3%−11.8%−15.7%
August 6, 2010August 4, 2010 ZD Sale $527,792 +6.5%+15.9%+7.3%
May 20, 2010May 18, 2010 ZD Sale $311,976 −4.3%−3.2%−3.8%
May 19, 2010May 17, 2010 ZD Sale $224,206 −6.1%−6.2%−2.4%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Zucker Nehemia traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.