undamentalytics Newsletter

Rusnack William C: insider trades

Director at 3 companies we cover. No open-market purchases and 12 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from March 11, 2010 to August 4, 2016.

What happened after Rusnack William C’s sales?

After their sales, the shares moved +0.2% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 40% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

Trade by trade

Rusnack William C: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 10 −1.0% −0.2% 50% 6 −0.73 0.50 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 10 +0.2% +3.7% 40% 6 −0.40 0.71 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 10 +1.1% +2.1% 40% 6 −0.31 0.77 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Flowserve Corp FLS —07March 11, 2010August 4, 2016
Sempra SRE —03September 3, 2010March 5, 2014
Peabody Energy Corp BTU —02March 16, 2010October 24, 2012

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
August 4, 2016August 3, 2016 FLS Sale $101,336 −6.9%−28.0%−26.2%
August 7, 2015August 7, 2015 FLS Sale $79,033 −2.5%−7.4%−4.3%
July 31, 2014July 30, 2014 FLS Sale $169,587 −12.4%−47.9%−46.3%
March 5, 2014March 3, 2014 SRE Sale $1,884,600 +5.0%+4.9%+2.2%
May 22, 2013May 21, 2013 FLS Sale $210,404 +2.0%+16.9%+14.6%
November 5, 2012November 2, 2012 FLS Sale $113,494 +4.1%+23.8%+28.3%
October 24, 2012October 24, 2012 BTU Sale $213,951 not yetnot yetnot yet
May 9, 2012May 7, 2012 FLS Sale $103,788 +11.0%+25.3%+25.0%
March 5, 2012March 1, 2012 SRE Sale $885,150 +14.8%+22.0%+24.6%
September 3, 2010September 3, 2010 SRE Sale $796,950 −16.2%−10.2%−8.7%
March 16, 2010March 12, 2010 BTU Sale $590,433 not yetnot yetnot yet
March 11, 2010March 10, 2010 FLS Sale $395,998 −9.2%+2.6%+2.1%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Rusnack William C traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.