undamentalytics Newsletter

Scott Bertram L: insider trades

Director at 2 companies we cover. No open-market purchases and 12 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from August 26, 2013 to September 21, 2026.

What happened after Scott Bertram L’s sales?

After their sales, the shares moved +1.3% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 57% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

Trade by trade

Scott Bertram L: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 10 +0.6% +3.8% 30% 7 1.29 0.25 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 7 +1.3% −2.5% 57% 6 0.49 0.64 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 7 +0.4% −1.6% 71% 6 0.39 0.71 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Equitable Holdings, Inc. EQH —07July 16, 2021September 21, 2026
Becton Dickinson BDX —05August 26, 2013February 18, 2026

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
September 21, 2026September 21, 2026 EQH Sale $151,093 not yetnot yetnot yet
August 10, 2026August 6, 2026 EQH Sale $74,986 not yetnot yetnot yet
June 5, 2026June 4, 2026 EQH Sale $101,468 +22.9%not yetnot yet
February 18, 2026February 18, 2026 BDX Sale $174,027 −27.5%not yetnot yet
November 7, 2025November 7, 2025 BDX Sale $38,318 +25.3%not yetnot yet
August 22, 2025August 21, 2025 EQH Sale $134,836 −17.5%−23.7%−24.4%
February 12, 2025February 12, 2025 BDX Sale $159,593 −20.2%−10.9%−13.1%
March 18, 2024March 18, 2024 EQH Sale $247,030 +5.8%+38.9%+39.2%
September 9, 2022September 8, 2022 EQH Sale $218,051 +0.3%−15.4%−16.8%
July 16, 2021July 15, 2021 EQH Sale $98,430 +9.5%+2.5%−1.4%
May 19, 2015May 18, 2015 BDX Sale $306,158 +5.7%+20.0%+20.7%
August 26, 2013August 23, 2013 BDX Sale $399,075 +1.8%−2.5%−1.6%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Scott Bertram L traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.