undamentalytics Newsletter

Powers Timothy H: insider trades

Chief executive, Officer, Director at 2 companies we cover. 1 open-market purchase and 18 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from March 2, 2010 to May 27, 2022.

Would copying Powers Timothy H’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 1 purchase has 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on May 31, 2022 into $12,247 by November 2, 2026, +4.7% a year. The copy held shares only 23% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $12,048, +4.3% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $19,458, +16.3% a year). Beta against the index was 0.48. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was +3.9% against the S&P 500 (median +3.9%), and 100% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was +11.4%. After their sales, the shares moved +11.9% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 0% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$10.0k$20.0k 20222023202420252026 $19.5k$12.2k$12.0k
Copying Powers Timothy HS&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Powers Timothy H’s open-market purchases from May 31, 2022, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
+4.7%
S&P 500, same days invested
+4.3% (held throughout +16.3%)
Time in shares
23%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
0.09 (0.73)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−21% (−19%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.48
Purchases copied
1

Trade by trade

Powers Timothy H: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 1 +3.6% +3.6% 100% 1 — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 1 +15.6% +15.6% 100% 1 — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 1 +3.9% +3.9% 100% 1 — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 1 +11.4% +11.4% 100% 1 — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 18 +3.3% +3.7% 28% 4 2.33 0.10 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 18 +11.9% +12.5% 0% 4 7.07 0.006 Some evidence: seller wrong
Sales, 12 months after the trade 18 +12.2% +13.1% 0% 4 7.76 0.004 Some evidence: seller wrong

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Hubbell Incorporated HUBB Chairman of the Board018March 2, 2010June 11, 2013
ITT Inc. ITT —10May 27, 2022May 27, 2022

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
May 27, 2022May 19, 2022 ITT Purchase $416,880 +3.6%+3.9%+11.4%
June 11, 2013June 10, 2013 HUBB Sale $907,006 +3.4%+6.1%+9.6%
February 20, 2013February 15, 2013 HUBB Sale $626,725 −0.4%+6.9%+7.1%
February 6, 2013February 4, 2013 HUBB Sale $911,100 −2.7%+8.8%+6.5%
August 1, 2012July 31, 2012 HUBB Sale $756,993 +0.7%+10.4%+9.2%
February 8, 2012February 6, 2012 HUBB Sale $3,564,700 +1.4%+12.2%+14.3%
February 7, 2012February 3, 2012 HUBB Sale $1,700,328 +3.2%+12.8%+15.1%
February 6, 2012February 2, 2012 HUBB Sale $2,040,853 +4.7%+12.8%+13.5%
February 3, 2012February 1, 2012 HUBB Sale $4,068,653 +6.1%+14.3%+13.2%
February 2, 2012January 31, 2012 HUBB Sale $1,164,671 +6.2%+15.1%+12.9%
December 9, 2011December 7, 2011 HUBB Sale $474,863 +11.7%+15.8%+17.6%
December 8, 2011December 6, 2011 HUBB Sale $497,862 +11.4%+15.4%+13.8%
February 17, 2011February 16, 2011 HUBB Sale $3,727,812 −1.9%+14.1%+13.8%
December 17, 2010December 15, 2010 HUBB Sale $3,596,056 +10.3%+8.1%+3.5%
December 16, 2010December 14, 2010 HUBB Sale $2,138,150 +9.8%+7.2%+5.3%
December 14, 2010December 13, 2010 HUBB Sale $917,339 +8.3%+3.5%+5.5%
October 27, 2010October 26, 2010 HUBB Sale $8,823,444 +3.9%+7.9%+4.3%
March 2, 2010February 26, 2010 HUBB Sale $3,514,218 −8.4%+21.5%+27.0%
March 2, 2010February 26, 2010 HUBB Sale $250,892 −8.4%+21.5%+27.0%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Powers Timothy H traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.