undamentalytics Newsletter

Wagner Daniel J: insider trades

Officer at Donegal Group Inc. 8 open-market purchases and 12 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from August 5, 2011 to November 14, 2025.

Would copying Wagner Daniel J’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 8 purchases have 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on August 8, 2011 into $18,283 by November 2, 2026, +4.0% a year. The copy held shares only 29% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $22,045, +5.3% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $87,956, +15.4% a year). Beta against the index was 0.18. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was −5.6% against the S&P 500 (median −6.0%), and 13% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was −4.8%. After their sales, the shares moved −20.0% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 73% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$25.0k$50.0k$75.0k 20112013201520172019202120232025 $88.0k$22.0k$18.3k
Copying Wagner Daniel JS&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Wagner Daniel J’s open-market purchases from August 8, 2011, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
+4.0%
S&P 500, same days invested
+5.3% (held throughout +15.4%)
Time in shares
29%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
0.23 (0.83)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−20% (−34%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.18
Purchases copied
8

Trade by trade

Wagner Daniel J: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 8 +1.6% +0.1% 50% 4 1.29 0.29 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 6 months after the report 8 −1.0% −0.9% 50% 4 −0.46 0.68 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the report 8 −5.6% −6.0% 13% 4 −0.64 0.57 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 8 −4.8% −4.8% 13% 4 −0.75 0.51 No reliable evidence
Sales, 3 months after the report 12 −8.9% −7.6% 83% 6 −0.77 0.48 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 11 −20.0% −30.1% 73% 6 −1.63 0.17 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 11 −22.0% −29.2% 73% 6 −1.74 0.14 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Donegal Group Inc DGICA Sr. VP & Treasurer812August 5, 2011November 14, 2025

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
November 14, 2025November 12, 2025 DGICA Sale $355,764 −13.5%not yetnot yet
May 13, 2025May 9, 2025 DGICA Sale $278,996 −20.4%−37.0%−42.8%
May 9, 2025May 7, 2025 DGICA Sale $294,221 −21.6%−39.3%−41.9%
May 6, 2025May 5, 2025 DGICA Sale $143,020 −26.5%−41.9%−45.3%
May 5, 2025May 1, 2025 DGICA Sale $406,980 −26.6%−41.9%−42.1%
December 9, 2024December 6, 2024 DGICA Sale $666,800 +19.6%+16.1%+12.5%
November 1, 2024October 31, 2024 DGICA Sale $542,500 −4.4%+12.2%+10.8%
June 16, 2023June 14, 2023 DGICA Sale $544,950 −1.1%−36.1%−39.2%
August 24, 2022August 23, 2022 DGICA Sale $690,784 +5.6%−5.4%−5.4%
September 14, 2020September 10, 2020 DGICA Sale $1,109,250 −9.7%−30.1%−29.2%
August 17, 2020August 14, 2020 DGICA Sale $669,150 −5.5%−20.7%−22.9%
May 21, 2015May 20, 2015 DGICA Purchase $25,003 +6.6%+12.0%+8.8%
April 29, 2015April 29, 2015 DGICA Sale $618,000 −2.7%+4.1%+3.9%
September 9, 2014September 8, 2014 DGICA Purchase $21,075 −0.1%−7.0%−7.2%
May 8, 2014May 6, 2014 DGICA Purchase $140,000 +4.0%−4.9%−3.4%
March 3, 2014February 28, 2014 DGICA Purchase $16,596 +0.2%−5.0%−4.7%
August 28, 2013August 27, 2013 DGICA Purchase $17,186 +10.5%−3.0%−5.0%
March 14, 2013March 13, 2013 DGICA Purchase $43,655 −4.1%−14.4%−12.4%
November 15, 2011November 14, 2011 DGICA Purchase $130,703 −0.6%−13.1%−10.0%
August 5, 2011August 3, 2011 DGICA Purchase $247,451 −3.3%−9.4%−4.1%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Wagner Daniel J traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.