undamentalytics Newsletter

Craig John D: insider trades

Chief executive, Director at Enersys. No open-market purchases and 18 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from February 23, 2010 to June 1, 2016.

What happened after Craig John D’s sales?

After their sales, the shares moved +10.5% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 22% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

Trade by trade

Craig John D: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 18 −1.1% −1.4% 56% 4 −0.52 0.64 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 18 +10.5% +19.4% 22% 4 0.68 0.54 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 18 +12.6% +20.0% 22% 4 0.86 0.45 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Enersys ENS Chairman & CEO018February 23, 2010June 1, 2016

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
June 1, 2016May 27, 2016 ENS Sale $1,545,031 +6.5%+3.7%+23.6%
May 27, 2016May 26, 2016 ENS Sale $506,428 +11.7%+6.9%+24.2%
May 26, 2016May 24, 2016 ENS Sale $3,991,758 +13.8%+23.6%+23.8%
May 11, 2016May 9, 2016 ENS Sale $3,570,280 +14.0%+25.7%+26.3%
May 15, 2015May 13, 2015 ENS Sale $3,439,405 −19.9%−14.9%−14.7%
September 6, 2012September 4, 2012 ENS Sale $2,042,055 −7.6%+21.7%+12.7%
August 31, 2012August 29, 2012 ENS Sale $564,242 −13.7%+12.7%+17.9%
August 29, 2012August 27, 2012 ENS Sale $2,447,209 −7.7%+21.5%+20.8%
August 28, 2012August 24, 2012 ENS Sale $1,615,648 −8.6%+17.9%+19.8%
August 23, 2012August 21, 2012 ENS Sale $820,142 −7.4%+19.8%+21.8%
August 21, 2012August 17, 2012 ENS Sale $5,487,162 −10.0%+21.1%+19.0%
August 16, 2012August 14, 2012 ENS Sale $150,295 −11.9%+19.0%+19.0%
December 3, 2010December 1, 2010 ENS Sale $1,576,535 +4.0%−26.1%−27.7%
November 30, 2010November 26, 2010 ENS Sale $285,477 +4.7%−27.7%−27.9%
November 16, 2010November 12, 2010 ENS Sale $5,230,022 +10.5%−18.7%−19.3%
May 19, 2010May 17, 2010 ENS Sale $2,572,118 −1.6%+22.8%+20.2%
March 3, 2010March 1, 2010 ENS Sale $1,155,500 +5.0%+31.0%+30.8%
February 23, 2010February 19, 2010 ENS Sale $941,303 −1.1%+29.1%+35.9%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Craig John D traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.