undamentalytics Newsletter

Quercus Trust: insider trades

Director, 10% owner at Energy Focus, Inc. 1 open-market purchase and 9 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from January 13, 2010 to June 29, 2011.

Would copying Quercus Trust’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. None of their purchases has 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. None of their purchases could be priced, so there is no copy portfolio. None of these trades can be measured yet: either the window after the report has not finished or the share price was under $5 when it was reported.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

Trade by trade

Quercus Trust: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Energy Focus, Inc EFOI —19January 13, 2010June 29, 2011

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
June 29, 2011June 27, 2011 EFOI Sale $1,586,000 not yetnot yetnot yet
March 31, 2011March 29, 2011 EFOI Sale $148,385 not yetnot yetnot yet
January 6, 2011January 4, 2011 EFOI Sale $14,620 not yetnot yetnot yet
November 24, 2010November 22, 2010 EFOI Sale $28,800 not yetnot yetnot yet
November 3, 2010October 29, 2010 EFOI Sale $15,905 not yetnot yetnot yet
September 28, 2010September 24, 2010 EFOI Sale $24,398 not yetnot yetnot yet
September 23, 2010September 21, 2010 EFOI Sale $62,202 not yetnot yetnot yet
September 20, 2010September 16, 2010 EFOI Sale $40,968 not yetnot yetnot yet
September 15, 2010September 15, 2010 EFOI Sale $19,964 not yetnot yetnot yet
January 13, 2010December 31, 2009 EFOI Purchase $300,000 not yetnot yetnot yet

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Quercus Trust traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.