undamentalytics Newsletter

Berman Bernard D: insider trades

Chief executive, Officer, Director at Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. 9 open-market purchases and 1 sale not made under a pre-set plan, reported from June 16, 2010 to October 3, 2017.

Would copying Berman Bernard D’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 6 purchases have 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on June 17, 2010 into $8,484 by November 2, 2026, −1.0% a year. The copy held shares only 23% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $18,404, +3.8% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $90,244, +14.4% a year). Beta against the index was 0.16. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was −16.9% against the S&P 500 (median −18.8%), and 0% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was −16.4%. After their sales, the shares moved −19.0% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 100% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$50.0k$100k 201020122014201620182020202220242026 $90.2k$18.4k$8.5k
Copying Berman Bernard DS&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Berman Bernard D’s open-market purchases from June 17, 2010, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
−1.0%
S&P 500, same days invested
+3.8% (held throughout +14.4%)
Time in shares
23%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
−0.16 (0.79)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−49% (−34%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.16
Purchases copied
6

Trade by trade

Berman Bernard D: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 6 −3.2% −1.4% 33% 4 −1.27 0.29 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 6 months after the report 6 −5.5% −7.9% 17% 4 −1.53 0.22 No reliable evidence
Purchases, 12 months after the report 6 −16.9% −18.8% 0% 4 −3.98 0.028 Some evidence: behind
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 6 −16.4% −15.2% 0% 5 −4.15 0.014 Some evidence: behind
Sales, 3 months after the report 1 −15.0% −15.0% 100% 1 — — Not enough years
Sales, 12 months after the report 1 −19.0% −19.0% 100% 1 — — Not enough years
Sales, 12 months after the trade 1 −19.4% −19.4% 100% 1 — — Not enough years

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp OCSL Chief Executive Officer91June 16, 2010October 3, 2017

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
October 3, 2017September 29, 2017 OCSL Sale $108,600 −15.0%−19.0%−19.4%
March 17, 2017March 17, 2017 OCSL Purchase $22,750 not yetnot yetnot yet
March 6, 2017March 3, 2017 OCSL Purchase $65,600 not yetnot yetnot yet
February 13, 2017February 10, 2017 OCSL Purchase $46,050 not yetnot yetnot yet
February 11, 2015February 10, 2015 OCSL Purchase $13,980 −0.3%−17.3%−14.4%
December 15, 2014December 11, 2014 OCSL Purchase $16,376 −13.9%−20.4%−16.0%
May 24, 2013May 23, 2013 OCSL Purchase $10,470 +1.3%−20.2%−19.8%
January 2, 2013December 28, 2012 OCSL Purchase $10,180 −2.5%−32.2%−33.9%
August 13, 2010August 11, 2010 OCSL Purchase $10,210 +4.9%−6.8%−10.2%
June 16, 2010June 16, 2010 OCSL Purchase $11,500 −8.4%−4.3%−4.4%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Berman Bernard D traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.