undamentalytics Newsletter

Amato Elizabeth B: insider trades

Officer, Director at 2 companies we cover. 2 open-market purchases and 16 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from August 9, 2012 to March 7, 2024.

Would copying Amato Elizabeth B’s purchases have beaten the S&P 500?

Too few purchases to judge. Only 2 purchases have 12 months of prices after the report; we judge insiders once they have 20. The figures below can swing a long way on a handful of trades. Buying each purchase the day after it was reported, an equal amount each, and holding it 12 months or until they reported a sale would have turned $10,000 on February 3, 2020 into $13,962 by November 2, 2026, +5.1% a year. The copy held shares only 15% of the time, so the fair comparison is the S&P 500 on those same days with Treasury bills otherwise: $13,412, +4.5% a year (the S&P 500 held throughout made $25,669, +15.0% a year). Beta against the index was 0.01. Twelve months after each report, the average purchase was −20.8% against the S&P 500 (median −20.8%), and 50% beat it. Measured from the trade date, the insider’s own timing, the average was +5.5%. After their sales, the shares moved −8.9% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 56% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

$0$10.0k$20.0k 2020202120222023202420252026 $25.7k$14.0k$13.4k
Copying Amato Elizabeth BS&P 500, same days investedS&P 500, held throughout $10,000 copying Amato Elizabeth B’s open-market purchases from February 3, 2020, before costs and taxes, marked weekly. Each purchase gets the same starting stake, bought at the close of the first trading day after the report and sold 12 months later or the day after a reported sale of that stock; uninvested money earns the Treasury bill rate. “Same days invested” holds the S&P 500 only on the days the copy held shares, Treasury bills otherwise.
Return a year, copying
+5.1%
S&P 500, same days invested
+4.5% (held throughout +15.0%)
Time in shares
15%
Sharpe ratio (S&P 500)
0.27 (0.65)
Biggest drop (S&P 500)
−18% (−34%)
Market sensitivity (beta)
0.01
Purchases copied
2

Trade by trade

Amato Elizabeth B: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 2 −12.4% −12.4% 50% 2 — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 2 −18.2% −18.2% 50% 2 — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 2 −20.8% −20.8% 50% 2 — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 2 +5.5% +5.5% 100% 2 — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 16 −2.7% +0.1% 50% 9 −0.87 0.41 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the report 16 −8.9% −4.9% 56% 9 −1.08 0.31 No reliable evidence
Sales, 12 months after the trade 16 −8.6% −1.9% 56% 9 −1.15 0.28 No reliable evidence

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
RTX Corporation RTX EVP & Chief HR Officer116August 9, 2012March 5, 2020
Essential Utilities, Inc. WTRG —10March 7, 2024March 7, 2024

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
March 7, 2024March 5, 2024 WTRG Purchase $108,562 +0.4%+1.9%+4.2%
March 5, 2020March 4, 2020 RTX Sale $584,059 −16.6%−32.9%−35.0%
February 14, 2020February 12, 2020 RTX Sale $1,946,888 −26.8%−40.1%−41.8%
January 31, 2020September 12, 2017 RTX Purchase $27,554 −25.3%−43.5%+6.9%
September 13, 2019September 12, 2019 RTX Sale $564,221 +2.3%−43.0%−41.1%
July 30, 2019July 29, 2019 RTX Sale $583,282 +4.5%−41.1%−35.5%
February 15, 2019February 14, 2019 RTX Sale $1,249,422 +1.7%−4.4%+0.9%
April 27, 2018April 26, 2018 RTX Sale $812,153 +5.1%+8.1%+5.9%
December 18, 2017December 15, 2017 RTX Sale $546,619 −0.7%−5.3%−3.1%
February 17, 2017February 16, 2017 RTX Sale $335,052 +7.0%+1.2%−0.6%
May 12, 2016May 10, 2016 RTX Sale $377,436 +2.1%+3.8%+4.0%
March 18, 2015March 16, 2015 RTX Sale $586,162 −4.4%−14.9%−16.6%
June 10, 2014June 9, 2014 RTX Sale $858,572 −10.9%−8.5%−9.7%
February 28, 2014February 26, 2014 RTX Sale $831,688 −3.7%−9.9%−8.6%
March 18, 2013March 15, 2013 RTX Sale $782,712 −3.3%+2.5%+3.9%
February 22, 2013February 20, 2013 RTX Sale $758,436 −3.3%+7.4%+6.3%
September 18, 2012September 14, 2012 RTX Sale $822,400 +3.0%+18.1%+17.7%
August 9, 2012August 7, 2012 RTX Sale $782,810 +0.8%+16.6%+15.3%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Amato Elizabeth B traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.