Archer Daniels Midland vs Bunge Global
Archer Daniels Midland and Bunge Global are similar in size: $80.27bn and $70.33bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Bunge Global grew faster (32.4% against -6.2%). Archer Daniels Midland kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 1.3% against 1.2%. Archer Daniels Midland carries less debt relative to equity (37.0% against 88.3%).
| Latest fiscal year | Archer Daniels MidlandADM, 2025 | Bunge GlobalBG, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.27bn | $70.33bn |
| Revenue growth | -6.2% | 32.4% |
| Net income | $1.08bn | $816m |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Return on equity | 4.8% | 6.3% |
| Free cash flow | $4.20bn | −$879m |
| Cash | $1.01bn | $1.14bn |
| Total debt | $8.41bn | $14.05bn |
| Debt to equity | 37.0% | 88.3% |
| Dividend per share | $2.04 | $2.80 |
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Share buybacks | $0 | $551m |
| Employees | — | 34,000 |
| Market value | $33.78bn | $18.37bn |
| Price vs our value range | Below our value range | — |
| Moat score | 44 (Weak) | — |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 1 buys, 4 sales | 2 buys, 3 sales |