undamentalytics Newsletter

Adma Biologics vs Krystal Biotech

Adma Biologics is the larger business, with $510m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $389m for Krystal Biotech (1.3 times as much). Krystal Biotech grew faster (33.9% against 19.6%). Krystal Biotech kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 52.6% against 28.8%.

Latest fiscal yearAdma BiologicsADMA, 2025Krystal BiotechKRYS, 2025
Revenue $510m $389m
Revenue growth 19.6% 33.9%
Net income $147m $205m
Operating margin — 41.5%
Net margin 28.8% 52.6%
Return on equity 35.6% 18.9%
Free cash flow $27.8m $189m
Cash $87.6m $496m
Total debt $72.1m $0
Debt to equity — 0.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks $31.9m —
Employees 647 —
Market value $2.48bn $9.00bn
Price vs our value range Within our value range Within our value range
Moat score 40 (Weak) —
Insider trades, 12 months 5 buys, 9 sales 0 buys, 142 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.