undamentalytics Newsletter

Allison Transmission Holdings vs Oshkosh

Oshkosh is the larger business, with $10.42bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $3.01bn for Allison Transmission Holdings (3.5 times as much). Oshkosh grew faster (-2.9% against -6.7%). Allison Transmission Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 20.7% against 6.2%.

Latest fiscal yearAllison Transmission HoldingsALSN, 2025OshkoshOSK, 2025
Revenue $3.01bn $10.42bn
Revenue growth -6.7% -2.9%
Net income $623m $647m
Operating margin — —
Net margin 20.7% 6.2%
Return on equity 35.4% 14.9%
Free cash flow $661m $618m
Cash $1.50bn $480m
Total debt $2.91bn $1.10bn
Debt to equity — —
Dividend per share $1.08 $2.04
Dividend yield 1.0% 1.6%
Share buybacks $328m $278m
Employees 4,000 18,400
Market value $9.98bn $8.72bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Within our value range
Moat score 94 (Strong) 57 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 12 sales 0 buys, 5 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.