undamentalytics Newsletter

CG Oncology vs Taysha Gene Therapies

Taysha Gene Therapies is the larger business, with $9.8m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $4.0m for CG Oncology (2.4 times as much). CG Oncology grew faster (254.7% against 17.3%). Taysha Gene Therapies kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -1115.3% against -3985.0%. CG Oncology carries less debt relative to equity (0.4% against 20.3%).

Latest fiscal yearCG OncologyCGON, 2025Taysha Gene TherapiesTSHA, 2025
Revenue $4.0m $9.8m
Revenue growth 254.7% 17.3%
Net income −$161m −$109m
Operating margin -4722.1% -1130.6%
Net margin -3985.0% -1115.3%
Return on equity -21.7% -68.5%
Free cash flow −$132m −$93.8m
Cash $32.5m $320m
Total debt $3.0m $50.1m
Debt to equity 0.4% 20.3%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees 142 99
Market value $5.69bn $1.32bn
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — —
Insider trades, 12 months 1 buys, 17 sales 0 buys, 12 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.