Climb Global Solutions vs Richardson Electronics
Climb Global Solutions is the larger business, with $653m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $229m for Richardson Electronics (2.9 times as much). Climb Global Solutions grew faster (40.1% against 9.4%). Climb Global Solutions kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 3.3% against 2.8%. Richardson Electronics carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 0.2%).
| Latest fiscal year | Climb Global SolutionsCLMB, 2025 | Richardson ElectronicsRELL, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $653m | $229m |
| Revenue growth | 40.1% | 9.4% |
| Net income | $21.3m | $6.4m |
| Operating margin | 4.5% | 2.8% |
| Net margin | 3.3% | 2.8% |
| Return on equity | 20.6% | 4.0% |
| Free cash flow | $16.6m | −$3.6m |
| Cash | $36.6m | $31.8m |
| Total debt | $191,000 | $0 |
| Debt to equity | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Dividend per share | $0.68 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.1% | 1.4% |
| Share buybacks | $2.0m | — |
| Employees | 412 | — |
| Market value | $750m | $254m |
| Price vs our value range | Below our value range | Above our value range |
| Moat score | 41 (Weak) | 22 (Weak) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 1 buys, 1 sales | 0 buys, 24 sales |