undamentalytics Newsletter

Celestica vs Sanmina

Celestica is the larger business, with $12.39bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $8.13bn for Sanmina (1.5 times as much). Celestica grew faster (28.5% against 7.4%). Celestica kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 6.7% against 3.0%. Sanmina carries less debt relative to equity (11.8% against 35.0%).

Latest fiscal yearCelesticaCLS, 2025SanminaSANM, 2025
Revenue $12.39bn $8.13bn
Revenue growth 28.5% 7.4%
Net income $833m $246m
Operating margin 8.4% 4.4%
Net margin 6.7% 3.0%
Return on equity 40.5% 10.0%
Free cash flow $458m $473m
Cash $596m $926m
Total debt $777m $300m
Debt to equity 35.0% 11.8%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks $153m —
Employees — 39,000
Market value $31.54bn $9.06bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range Below our value range
Moat score — 48 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 166 sales 1 buys, 20 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.