CNA Financial vs W. R. Berkley
CNA Financial and W. R. Berkley are similar in size: $14.99bn and $14.71bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. W. R. Berkley grew faster (7.8% against 5.0%). W. R. Berkley kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 12.1% against 8.5%.
| Latest fiscal year | CNA FinancialCNA, 2025 | W. R. BerkleyWRB, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.99bn | $14.71bn |
| Revenue growth | 5.0% | 7.8% |
| Net income | $1.28bn | $1.78bn |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 8.5% | 12.1% |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | 19.7% |
| Free cash flow | $2.40bn | $3.58bn |
| Cash | $425m | $2.54bn |
| Total debt | $2.97bn | $0 |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.0% |
| Dividend per share | $3.84 | $1.85 |
| Dividend yield | 8.2% | 2.5% |
| Share buybacks | $34.0m | $270m |
| Employees | 6,600 | — |
| Market value | $12.79bn | $27.89bn |
| Price vs our value range | — | — |
| Moat score | 66 (Moderate) | 75 (Strong) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 6 sales | 94 buys, 0 sales |