undamentalytics Newsletter

Chesapeake Utilities vs Northwest Natural Holding

Northwest Natural Holding is the larger business, with $1.29bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $930m for Chesapeake Utilities (1.4 times as much). Chesapeake Utilities grew faster (18.1% against 11.8%). Chesapeake Utilities kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 15.1% against 8.8%. Chesapeake Utilities carries less debt relative to equity (109.7% against 176.6%).

Latest fiscal yearChesapeake UtilitiesCPK, 2025Northwest Natural HoldingNWN, 2025
Revenue $930m $1.29bn
Revenue growth 18.1% 11.8%
Net income $140m $113m
Operating margin 27.5% 21.8%
Net margin 15.1% 8.8%
Return on equity 9.4% 7.9%
Free cash flow −$215m −$198m
Cash $1.8m $36.7m
Total debt $1.75bn $2.60bn
Debt to equity 109.7% 176.6%
Dividend per share $2.69 $1.96
Dividend yield 1.9% 3.7%
Share buybacks — —
Employees — —
Market value $3.36bn $2.13bn
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score 39 (Weak) 26 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 14 sales 2 buys, 15 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.