undamentalytics Newsletter

Castle Biosciences vs Fulgent Genetics

Castle Biosciences and Fulgent Genetics are similar in size: $344m and $323m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Fulgent Genetics grew faster (13.8% against 3.7%). Castle Biosciences kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -7.0% against -18.8%. Fulgent Genetics carries less debt relative to equity (0.2% against 2.2%).

Latest fiscal yearCastle BiosciencesCSTL, 2025Fulgent GeneticsFLGT, 2025
Revenue $344m $323m
Revenue growth 3.7% 13.8%
Net income −$24.2m −$60.5m
Operating margin -12.4% -28.2%
Net margin -7.0% -18.8%
Return on equity -5.2% -5.4%
Free cash flow $28.3m −$124m
Cash $117m $50.2m
Total debt $10.2m $2.4m
Debt to equity 2.2% 0.2%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — $10.9m
Employees 883 —
Market value $1.07bn $531m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score 32 (Weak) 23 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 170 sales 0 buys, 15 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.