undamentalytics Newsletter

Castle Biosciences vs Schrodinger

Castle Biosciences is the larger business, with $344m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $256m for Schrodinger (1.3 times as much). Schrodinger grew faster (23.3% against 3.7%). Castle Biosciences kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -7.0% against -40.4%. Schrodinger carries less debt relative to equity (0.0% against 2.2%).

Latest fiscal yearCastle BiosciencesCSTL, 2025SchrodingerSDGR, 2025
Revenue $344m $256m
Revenue growth 3.7% 23.3%
Net income −$24.2m −$103m
Operating margin -12.4% -65.2%
Net margin -7.0% -40.4%
Return on equity -5.2% -26.3%
Free cash flow $28.3m $12.5m
Cash $117m $231m
Total debt $10.2m $0
Debt to equity 2.2% 0.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees 883 850
Market value $1.07bn $2.05bn
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score 32 (Weak) 28 (Weak)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 170 sales 0 buys, 20 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.