undamentalytics Newsletter

EPAM Systems vs Science Applications International

Science Applications International is the larger business, with $7.26bn of revenue in fiscal 2026 against $5.46bn for EPAM Systems (1.3 times as much). EPAM Systems grew faster (15.4% against -2.9%). EPAM Systems kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 6.9% against 4.9%.

Latest fiscal yearEPAM SystemsEPAM, 2025Science Applications InternationalSAIC, 2026
Revenue $5.46bn $7.26bn
Revenue growth 15.4% -2.9%
Net income $378m $358m
Operating margin 9.5% —
Net margin 6.9% 4.9%
Return on equity 10.3% 23.3%
Free cash flow $613m $577m
Cash $1.30bn $182m
Total debt $25.0m $2.49bn
Debt to equity 0.7% —
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — 1.0%
Share buybacks $662m $445m
Employees 53,150 23,000
Market value $7.02bn $6.40bn
Price vs our value range Within our value range Within our value range
Moat score 63 (Moderate) 49 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 6 buys, 4 sales 7 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.