undamentalytics Newsletter

Quaker Chemical vs Minerals Technologies

Quaker Chemical and Minerals Technologies are similar in size: $1.89bn and $2.07bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Quaker Chemical grew faster (2.7% against -2.2%). Quaker Chemical kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -0.1% against -0.9%.

Latest fiscal yearQuaker ChemicalKWR, 2025Minerals TechnologiesMTX, 2025
Revenue $1.89bn $2.07bn
Revenue growth 2.7% -2.2%
Net income −$2.5m −$18.4m
Operating margin — 2.3%
Net margin -0.1% -0.9%
Return on equity -0.2% -1.1%
Free cash flow $80.6m $86.6m
Cash $180m $329m
Total debt $905m $962m
Debt to equity — 56.1%
Dividend per share $1.99 $0.45
Dividend yield 1.4% 0.7%
Share buybacks $41.5m $58.5m
Employees 4,700 —
Market value $2.61bn $2.01bn
Price vs our value range Within our value range Within our value range
Moat score 54 (Moderate) 50 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 2 sales 0 buys, 4 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.