undamentalytics Newsletter

Sondergaard Peter: insider trades

Officer at Gartner. No open-market purchases and 20 sales not made under a pre-set plan, reported from February 18, 2010 to May 17, 2018.

What happened after Sondergaard Peter’s sales?

After their sales, the shares moved +10.6% against the index over 12 months on average (a negative figure means selling was the right call); 15% trailed it.

With 296 insiders tested, some will look skilled or unskilled by chance alone: when we replaced each insider’s stocks with random companies bought on the same days, about 5.7 cleared the bar ahead and 23.3 behind. One record on its own proves little.

Trade by trade

Sondergaard Peter: trades against the S&P 500 afterwards
MeasuredTrades countedAverage vs S&P 500MedianWent the right wayYearst-statisticp-valueEvidence
Purchases, 3 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 6 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the report 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Purchases, 12 months after the trade 0 — — — — — — Not enough years
Sales, 3 months after the report 20 +4.0% +3.5% 20% 8 3.25 0.014 Some evidence: seller wrong
Sales, 12 months after the report 20 +10.6% +11.7% 15% 8 3.28 0.013 Some evidence: seller wrong
Sales, 12 months after the trade 20 +10.8% +9.9% 10% 8 3.16 0.016 Some evidence: seller wrong

“Average vs S&P 500” is the stock’s return including dividends minus the index’s over the same dates, from the close on the first trading day after the report, or from the close on the trade date. Only windows that have finished are counted. For sales, a negative figure means the stock lagged after it was sold, so selling was the right call (green). “Went the right way” is the share of purchases that beat the index, or of sales that trailed it. The t-statistic uses one average per year of reports, because one person’s trades bunch into the same stock and weeks, and needs trades in at least four different years; the p-value comes from the t distribution with that number of years (with four years, a t of 2 has p = 0.14). “Some evidence” means p under 5%, “strong evidence” p under 1% over at least six years.

Companies traded

CompanyTitle on the latest filingPurchasesSalesFirst reportLatest report
Gartner IT EVP, Research020February 18, 2010May 17, 2018

Trades and what followed

Moves are against the S&P 500; green means the trade went the insider’s way.

ReportedTradedCompanyTradeValue3 months after report12 months after report12 months after trade
May 17, 2018May 15, 2018 IT Sale $360,968 +1.1%+7.1%+6.5%
March 12, 2018March 8, 2018 IT Sale $664,180 +10.2%+12.4%+16.1%
May 19, 2017May 18, 2017 IT Sale $466,847 +2.4%−0.6%+2.6%
November 24, 2015November 20, 2015 IT Sale $826,329 −3.7%+4.3%+9.7%
June 2, 2015May 29, 2015 IT Sale $156,600 +4.6%+15.8%+15.3%
March 10, 2015March 6, 2015 IT Sale $437,237 +4.9%+3.9%+6.7%
September 16, 2014September 12, 2014 IT Sale $390,838 +11.1%+15.3%+11.7%
August 27, 2014August 25, 2014 IT Sale $123,828 +9.9%+15.7%+16.7%
June 16, 2014June 13, 2014 IT Sale $586,406 +5.7%+15.1%+13.7%
December 13, 2013December 12, 2013 IT Sale $200,487 +3.4%+11.1%+10.0%
June 11, 2013June 7, 2013 IT Sale $2,316,503 −2.5%+1.9%+3.7%
December 5, 2012December 4, 2012 IT Sale $1,345,190 +0.3%+12.4%+9.9%
September 13, 2012September 12, 2012 IT Sale $1,005,450 −6.0%−4.4%−6.3%
June 18, 2012June 15, 2012 IT Sale $1,428,544 +5.5%+12.9%+10.5%
May 18, 2012May 17, 2012 IT Sale $127,827 +8.9%+8.0%+8.1%
December 8, 2011December 7, 2011 IT Sale $56,238 +3.6%+12.9%+11.8%
June 16, 2011June 15, 2011 IT Sale $300,000 +2.4%+10.4%+5.3%
March 4, 2011March 3, 2011 IT Sale $301,002 −1.5%−1.5%−3.6%
June 2, 2010June 1, 2010 IT Sale $284,644 +18.0%+31.1%+34.3%
February 18, 2010February 17, 2010 IT Sale $200,486 +1.5%+28.7%+34.0%

Open-market purchases and sales of at least $10,000 in companies we cover, from SEC Form 4 filings; sales made under a pre-set Rule 10b5-1 plan are not shown. “Not yet” means the window has not finished or the share price was under $5 at entry. These are the shares’ moves after each trade: they say nothing about why Sondergaard Peter traded and do not suggest the use of non-public information. How every insider compares · the insider trading backtest.