undamentalytics Newsletter

Aware Inc: what the price is pricing in

There is no current cash flow reading for Aware Inc: its latest is from December 31, 2019. Switch lens below to see the other readings and how trading the gap would have done.

No published rating for Aware Inc: free cash flow after stock pay is not positive. The readings below run our models backwards for research and show how trading the gap would have done; they are not a valuation or a rating. The valuation page shows the models and their status.

What growth in cash flow is the price paying for?

No current reading. The latest is from December 31, 2019: the figures this lens needs have not been filed recently enough (or no longer apply), so there is no position this quarter.

Quarters with a position53 long, 2 short, since March 31, 2012
Beat the S&P 5004 of 580.0% of quarters held
Strategy against the index+157.0%cumulative; worst fall -4.3%
$10,000 became$39,539S&P 500 bought and held: $15,488

Over time

The growth in owner earnings (free cash flow after stock-based pay) that would justify the share price in our discounted-cash-flow model, against the growth the model itself assumes from the company's record.

-10%0%11%21%31% 201220152016201720182019 $2.8$4.2$5.5$6.8 Long from 2012-03-31Short from 2015-09-30Long from 2016-03-31Long from 2017-03-31Short from 2019-12-31
Growth our model assumes Growth the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

$0$20.0k$40.0k 2012201520162017201820192020 $39.5k$15.5k
StrategyS&P 500, buy and hold Hypothetical, before costs. The strategy holds the S&P 500 and only changes on a signal: it switches into AWRE in long quarters and adds a short of AWRE in short quarters. The gap between the lines is what the signal added or lost.

Skill or luck?

In plain English: With only 5 quarters of positions, Aware Inc's own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.

PositionsQuartersBeat the S&P 500Average vs S&P 500, a quarterTypical (median), a quarterA yearConfidence (t)Evidence
Longs 3 100.0% +40.7% +13.9% +229.8% 1.33 Too few quarters
Shorts 2 50.0% +2.7% +2.7% +10.3% — Too few quarters
All positions 5 80.0% +25.5% +9.7% +112.8% 1.32 Too few quarters

Each position is measured against the S&P 500 over the same quarter: a long earns the stock's return minus the index's, a short the index's minus the stock's. "A year" compounds the per-quarter results. Evidence: strong at a t-statistic of 2 or more, some from 1.5; "worse" when the result is that far below zero; one company's history is a small sample, so read these alongside the results across all companies.

Every quarter (18)
FromPrice paidGrowth the price impliesGrowth our model assumesPositionAWRES&P 500
December 31, 2019 $3.36 30.9% 2.0% Short −15.2% −19.4%
September 30, 2019 $2.99 6.4% 4.0% No position +12.4% +9.0%
June 30, 2019 $3.32 6.5% 6.3% No position −9.9% +1.8%
March 31, 2019 $3.62 6.3% 2.0% No position −8.3% +4.2%
June 30, 2018 $4.05 -1.9% 4.0% No position −11.1% +7.7%
March 31, 2018 $4.15 -3.8% 4.0% No position −2.4% +3.5%
December 31, 2017 $4.50 3.6% 4.0% No position −7.8% −1.0%
September 30, 2017 $4.65 0.8% 4.0% No position −3.2% +6.8%
June 30, 2017 $5.15 0.4% 2.0% No position −9.7% +4.4%
March 31, 2017 $4.70 -4.5% 6.8% Long +9.6% +3.1%
December 31, 2016 $6.10 7.9% 13.0% No position −22.9% +5.9%
September 30, 2016 $5.30 5.5% 12.9% No position +15.1% +4.0%
June 30, 2016 $4.34 -5.5% 2.0% No position +22.1% +3.8%
March 31, 2016 $3.73 -9.7% 4.0% Long +16.4% +2.5%
December 31, 2015 $3.26 -1.3% 4.0% No position +14.4% +1.3%
September 30, 2015 $3.35 23.9% 4.0% Short −2.7% +7.0%
June 30, 2012 $6.45 13.3% 6.8% No position −2.3% +6.3%
March 31, 2012 $3.90 2.5% 20.0% Long +98.9% −2.8%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

How the test works

At each quarter end since March 2010 we rebuild the models from Aware Inc's quarters ending at least 90 days earlier (and no more than 200 days before that), using the figures as later filed, including any restatement, and value them at that day's close, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs so that price and share count are on the same basis. A wide enough gap is a long or a short for one quarter (growth 10 points; margin and return on equity 5 points; a PEG under 0.75 or over 3), measured on total return against the S&P 500. The rules were set before the test. No trading or borrowing costs; today's list of companies. Not investment advice. All companies and the results across them.

Compare with peers

Head to head: AWRE vs BLINAWRE vs INLXAWRE vs SMSI

More: Application Software stocks compared, Technology sector, rankings of US companies

Figures from Aware Inc's SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q), retrieved November 3, 2026. How we read and check them: methodology and data sources. Not investment advice. Back to Aware Inc.