Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.: what the price is pricing in

The price implies cash-flow growth of -30.0% a year; our model expects 10.9%. That gap is wide enough for a long position this quarter. Switch lens below to see the same question asked of earnings, growth, sales and book value.

No published rating for Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.: held for review: our cash-flow value ($26.97) was left out of our combined valuation (it is 55.05x the share price, outside the 0.2-5x range we accept), so it can't be the basis of a rating. The readings below run our models backwards for research and show how trading the gap would have done; they are not a valuation or a rating. The valuation page shows the models and their status.

What growth in cash flow is the price paying for?

The price implies cash-flow growth of -30.0% a year; our model expects 10.9%.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

What the price implies What our model expects

Quarters with a position33 long, 0 short, since December 31, 2025

Beat the S&P 5002 of 366.7% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+0.1%cumulative; worst fall -36.7%

Over time

The growth in owner earnings (free cash flow after stock-based pay) that would justify the share price in our discounted-cash-flow model, against the growth the model itself assumes from the company's record.

Growth our model assumes Growth the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

Skill or luck?

In plain English: With only 3 quarters of positions, Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.'s own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	3	66.7%	+5.1%	+18.4%	+0.1%	0.24	Too few quarters
Shorts	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
All positions	3	66.7%	+5.1%	+18.4%	+0.1%	0.24	Too few quarters

Each position is measured against the S&P 500 over the same quarter: a long earns the stock's return minus the index's, a short the index's minus the stock's. "A year" compounds the per-quarter results. Evidence: strong at a t-statistic of 2 or more, some from 1.5; "worse" when the result is that far below zero; one company's history is a small sample, so read these alongside the results across all companies.

Every quarter (4)

From	Price paid	Growth the price implies	Growth our model assumes	Position	GTEC	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$0.74	-30.0%*	10.9%	Long	−22.1%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$0.55	-30.0%*	9.1%	Long	+36.0%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$0.70	-30.0%*	4.0%	Long	−21.6%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$0.61	-30.0%*	2.0%	Long	+14.0%	−4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split. * At the edge of the range we solve for.

What growth in earnings is the price paying for?

The price implies earnings growth of -30.0% a year; our model expects 10.9%.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

What the price implies What our model expects

Quarters with a position33 long, 0 short, since December 31, 2025

Beat the S&P 5002 of 366.7% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+0.1%cumulative; worst fall -36.7%

Over time

The earnings growth the price-to-earnings ratio requires, against the growth our model assumes. Net income is already after interest, so it is valued at the return shareholders require, plus spare cash (none for banks and insurers, whose cash is funded by deposits and policies), with no debt subtracted.

Growth our model assumes Growth the P/E implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

Skill or luck?

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	3	66.7%	+5.1%	+18.4%	+0.1%	0.24	Too few quarters
Shorts	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
All positions	3	66.7%	+5.1%	+18.4%	+0.1%	0.24	Too few quarters

Every quarter (4)

From	Price paid	Growth the P/E implies	Growth our model assumes	Position	GTEC	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$0.74	-30.0%*	10.9%	Long	−22.1%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$0.55	-30.0%*	9.1%	Long	+36.0%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$0.70	-30.0%*	4.0%	Long	−21.6%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$0.61	-30.0%*	2.0%	Long	+14.0%	−4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split. * At the edge of the range we solve for.

Is the price-to-earnings ratio cheap or dear for the growth delivered?

Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. trades on 1.6 times earnings while its earnings per share grew 80.4% a year: a PEG of 0.02.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

PEG: under 0.75 cheap for the growth, over 3 expensive

Quarters with a position33 long, 0 short, since December 31, 2025

Beat the S&P 5002 of 366.7% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+0.1%cumulative; worst fall -36.7%

Over time

The P/E divided by the earnings-per-share growth delivered over three years. Under 0.75 the market pays little for the growth (long); over 3 it pays a lot (short).

EPS growth, 3 years (%) Price-to-earnings ratio (x) Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

Skill or luck?

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	3	66.7%	+5.1%	+18.4%	+0.1%	0.24	Too few quarters
Shorts	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
All positions	3	66.7%	+5.1%	+18.4%	+0.1%	0.24	Too few quarters

Every quarter (4)

From	Price paid	Price-to-earnings ratio (x)	EPS growth, 3 years (%)	Position	GTEC	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$0.74	1.6x	80.4%	Long	−22.1%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$0.55	2.0x	114.6%	Long	+36.0%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$0.70	2.5x	69.5%	Long	−21.6%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$0.61	0.8x	29.7%	Long	+14.0%	−4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

What return on equity is the price paying for?

The price implies a return on equity of 3.8%; the company earned 16.0%.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

What the price implies What the company delivered

Quarters with a position11 long, 0 short, since December 31, 2025

Beat the S&P 5001 of 1100.0% of quarters held

Strategy against the index+18.4%cumulative; worst fall 0.0%

Over time

The return on equity that justifies the price-to-book ratio, (P/B)(r − g) + g with an 8.5% required return and 2.5% long-run growth, against the return the company delivered last year.

Return on equity delivered Return on equity the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

Skill or luck?

In plain English: With only 1 quarters of positions, Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.'s own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	1	100.0%	+18.4%	+18.4%	+96.5%	—	Too few quarters
Shorts	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
All positions	1	100.0%	+18.4%	+18.4%	+96.5%	—	Too few quarters

Every quarter (4)

From	Price paid	Return on equity the price implies	Return on equity delivered	Position	GTEC	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$0.74	3.8%	16.0%	Long	−22.1%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$0.55	3.4%	8.0%	No position	+36.0%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$0.70	3.5%	7.4%	No position	−21.6%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$0.61	3.4%	21.3%	Long	+14.0%	−4.4%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

How the test works

At each quarter end since March 2010 we rebuild the models from Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.'s quarters ending at least 90 days earlier (and no more than 200 days before that), using the figures as later filed, including any restatement, and value them at that day's close, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs so that price and share count are on the same basis. A wide enough gap is a long or a short for one quarter (growth 10 points; margin and return on equity 5 points; a PEG under 0.75 or over 3), measured on total return against the S&P 500. The rules were set before the test. No trading or borrowing costs; today's list of companies. Not investment advice. All companies and the results across them.

Compare with peers

Head to head: GTEC vs SYPR ERII vs GTEC

More: Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components stocks compared, Industrials sector, rankings of US companies

Figures from Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.'s SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q), retrieved October 29, 2026. How we read and check them: methodology and data sources. Not investment advice. Back to Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.