Nano Labs Ltd key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Nano Labs Ltd had return on equity of 27.2%, an operating margin of 264.4%, debt equal to 29.5% of equity and a current ratio of 2.09. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2020Dec 2020 | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 40.3% | −10.4% | 23.4% | — | 28.6% | — |
| Operating margin | <−999% | −453.3% | 2.1% | −332.9% | −281.4% | 264.4% |
| Net margin | <−999% | −443.6% | 3.2% | −322.7% | −278.8% | 501.6% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | −186.4% | 159.8% | −29.7% | −305.0% | −432.8% | −401.1% |
| Return on equity | — | — | 46.4% | — | −106.5% | 27.2% |
| Return on assets | — | −19.0% | 4.7% | −69.7% | −23.5% | 15.4% |
| Asset turnover | — | 0.04 | 1.49 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| Current ratio | — | 0.96 | 1.57 | 0.52 | 1.61 | 2.09 |
| Debt to equity | — | — | 10.3% | — | 84.1% | 29.5% |
| Interest cover (operating income ÷ interest) | — | — | — | — | n/m | 4.2x |
| Effective tax rate | — | — | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| R&D as % of revenue | >999% | 368.8% | 13.4% | 113.1% | 123.5% | 29.8% |
| Capital spending as % of revenue | 44.0% | 22.0% | 1.8% | 134.7% | 89.6% | 0.2% |
| Free cash flow ÷ net income | — | — | −939.9% | — | — | −80.0% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $62m of assets due within a year against $29m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $62m short-term assets against $25m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $1m of cash against $25m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 24% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Five-year comparison not available. Not assessable.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt −$15m of operating cash flow against $25m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of $10m against $2m of interest.
Moat
Not assessed: fewer than five years of comparable figures in the filings. AI disruption exposure for this industry: Low.
Compare with peers
- GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. statistics
- Aeluma, Inc. statistics
- Mobix Labs, Inc statistics
- Peraso Inc. statistics
- Arbe Robotics Ltd. statistics
Head to head: GCTS vs NAALMU vs NAMOBX vs NA
More: Semiconductors stocks compared, Technology sector, rankings of US companies