Precision Drilling Corp: what the price is pricing in
The price implies cash-flow growth of -11.2% a year; our model expects 2.0%. That gap is wide enough for a long position this quarter. Switch lens below to see the same question asked of earnings, growth, sales and book value.
What growth in cash flow is the price paying for?
The price implies cash-flow growth of -11.2% a year; our model expects 2.0%.
Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter
Over time
$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500
Skill or luck?
In plain English: Across 15 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 8, by +11.2% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 15 | 53.3% | +11.2% | +0.2% | +19.8% | 0.99 | No reliable evidence |
| Shorts | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| All positions | 15 | 53.3% | +11.2% | +0.2% | +19.8% | 0.99 | No reliable evidence |
Every quarter (21)
| From | Price paid | Growth the price implies | Growth our model assumes | Position | PDS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $80.58 | -11.2% | 2.0% | Long | +23.5% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $76.66 | -11.8% | 2.0% | Long | +5.1% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $98.40 | -8.8% | 2.0% | Long | −22.1% | +15.1% |
| September 30, 2025 | $56.36 | -13.4% | 7.4% | Long | +27.5% | +2.7% |
| June 30, 2025 | $47.24 | -15.1% | 7.4% | Long | +19.3% | +8.1% |
| March 31, 2025 | $46.62 | -15.3% | 7.4% | Long | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| September 30, 2024 | $61.65 | -9.0% | 20.0% | Long | −0.9% | +2.5% |
| June 30, 2024 | $70.34 | -7.7% | 20.0% | Long | −12.3% | +5.8% |
| March 31, 2024 | $67.29 | -8.1% | 20.0% | Long | +4.5% | +4.4% |
| September 30, 2023 | $67.12 | -17.8% | 13.0% | Long | −19.1% | +11.6% |
| June 30, 2023 | $48.75 | -23.4% | 13.0% | Long | +37.7% | −3.2% |
| March 31, 2023 | $51.42 | -22.5% | 13.0% | Long | −5.2% | +8.7% |
| September 30, 2022 | $50.63 | -4.4% | 4.0% | No position | +51.5% | +7.6% |
| June 30, 2022 | $64.02 | -2.5% | 4.0% | No position | −20.9% | −4.9% |
| March 31, 2022 | $73.92 | -1.3% | 4.0% | No position | −13.4% | −16.1% |
| September 30, 2021 | $40.41 | -4.4% | 4.0% | No position | −12.3% | +11.1% |
| June 30, 2021 | $41.70 | -4.2% | 4.0% | No position | −3.1% | +0.6% |
| March 31, 2021 | $21.61 | -7.8% | 4.0% | Long | +93.0% | +8.4% |
| September 30, 2020 | $0.64 | -11.0% | 6.2% | Long | +28.8% | +12.1% |
| June 30, 2020 | $0.76 | -10.5% | 6.2% | Long | −15.8% | +9.0% |
| March 31, 2020 | $0.31 | -12.4% | 6.2% | Long | +145.2% | +20.2% |
What growth in earnings is the price paying for?
The price implies earnings growth of 80.9% a year; our model expects 2.0%.
Market more optimistic than our model: short this quarter
Over time
$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500
Skill or luck?
In plain English: Across 9 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 5, by +18.3% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 7 | 57.1% | +18.6% | +0.2% | +58.6% | 1.01 | Too few quarters |
| Shorts | 2 | 50.0% | +17.2% | +17.2% | +78.1% | — | Too few quarters |
| All positions | 9 | 55.6% | +18.3% | +0.2% | +62.7% | 1.26 | No reliable evidence |
Every quarter (12)
| From | Price paid | Growth the P/E implies | Growth our model assumes | Position | PDS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $80.58 | 80.9% | 2.0% | Short | +23.5% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $76.66 | 79.6% | 2.0% | Short | +5.1% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $98.40 | 86.3% | 2.0% | Short | −22.1% | +15.1% |
| September 30, 2025 | $56.36 | -8.0% | 7.4% | Long | +27.5% | +2.7% |
| June 30, 2025 | $47.24 | -11.3% | 7.4% | Long | +19.3% | +8.1% |
| March 31, 2025 | $46.62 | -11.5% | 7.4% | Long | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| September 30, 2024 | $61.65 | -21.5% | 20.0% | Long | −0.9% | +2.5% |
| June 30, 2024 | $70.34 | -19.1% | 20.0% | Long | −12.3% | +5.8% |
| March 31, 2024 | $67.29 | -19.9% | 20.0% | Long | +4.5% | +4.4% |
| September 30, 2020 | $0.64 | 10.3% | 6.2% | No position | +28.8% | +12.1% |
| June 30, 2020 | $0.76 | 14.6% | 6.2% | No position | −15.8% | +9.0% |
| March 31, 2020 | $0.31 | -13.0% | 6.2% | Long | +145.2% | +20.2% |
What profit margin is the price paying for?
The price implies an owner-earnings margin of 6.9%; the company has kept 15.0%.
Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter
Over time
$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500
Skill or luck?
In plain English: Across 19 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 9, by +8.9% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 19 | 47.4% | +8.9% | −3.4% | +12.6% | 0.95 | No reliable evidence |
| Shorts | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| All positions | 19 | 47.4% | +8.9% | −3.4% | +12.6% | 0.95 | No reliable evidence |
Every quarter (21)
| From | Price paid | Margin the price implies | Margin delivered | Position | PDS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $80.58 | 6.9% | 15.0% | Long | +23.5% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $76.66 | 6.7% | 15.0% | Long | +5.1% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $98.40 | 8.0% | 15.0% | Long | −22.1% | +15.1% |
| September 30, 2025 | $56.36 | 4.2% | 14.1% | Long | +27.5% | +2.7% |
| June 30, 2025 | $47.24 | 3.8% | 14.1% | Long | +19.3% | +8.1% |
| March 31, 2025 | $46.62 | 3.8% | 14.1% | Long | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| September 30, 2024 | $61.65 | 2.5% | 12.8% | Long | −0.9% | +2.5% |
| June 30, 2024 | $70.34 | 2.7% | 12.8% | Long | −12.3% | +5.8% |
| March 31, 2024 | $67.29 | 2.6% | 12.8% | Long | +4.5% | +4.4% |
| September 30, 2023 | $67.12 | 2.3% | 13.8% | Long | −19.1% | +11.6% |
| June 30, 2023 | $48.75 | 1.7% | 13.8% | Long | +37.7% | −3.2% |
| March 31, 2023 | $51.42 | 1.8% | 13.8% | Long | −5.2% | +8.7% |
| September 30, 2022 | $50.63 | 10.4% | 16.9% | Long | +51.5% | +7.6% |
| June 30, 2022 | $64.02 | 11.6% | 16.9% | Long | −20.9% | −4.9% |
| March 31, 2022 | $73.92 | 12.5% | 16.9% | No position | −13.4% | −16.1% |
| September 30, 2021 | $40.41 | 11.1% | 18.0% | Long | −12.3% | +11.1% |
| June 30, 2021 | $41.70 | 11.2% | 18.0% | Long | −3.1% | +0.6% |
| March 31, 2021 | $21.61 | 9.1% | 18.0% | Long | +93.0% | +8.4% |
| September 30, 2020 | $0.64 | 5.0% | 13.7% | Long | +28.8% | +12.1% |
| June 30, 2020 | $0.76 | 5.2% | 13.7% | Long | −15.8% | +9.0% |
| March 31, 2020 | $0.31 | 4.6% | 13.7% | Long | +145.2% | +20.2% |
What return on equity is the price paying for?
The price implies a return on equity of 8.1%; the company earned 0.1%.
Market more optimistic than our model: short this quarter
Over time
$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500
Skill or luck?
In plain English: Across 11 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 5, by −6.8% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 3 | 33.3% | −7.1% | −3.4% | −26.7% | -1.28 | Too few quarters |
| Shorts | 8 | 50.0% | −6.7% | +0.5% | −59.2% | -0.48 | No reliable evidence |
| All positions | 11 | 45.5% | −6.8% | −2.7% | −52.2% | -0.68 | No reliable evidence |
Every quarter (18)
| From | Price paid | Return on equity the price implies | Return on equity delivered | Position | PDS | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $80.58 | 8.1% | 0.1% | Short | +23.5% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $76.66 | 7.8% | 0.1% | Short | +5.1% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $98.40 | 9.3% | 0.1% | Short | −22.1% | +15.1% |
| September 30, 2025 | $56.36 | 6.6% | 6.9% | No position | +27.5% | +2.7% |
| June 30, 2025 | $47.24 | 6.0% | 6.9% | No position | +19.3% | +8.1% |
| March 31, 2025 | $46.62 | 5.9% | 6.9% | No position | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| September 30, 2024 | $61.65 | 7.2% | 20.4% | Long | −0.9% | +2.5% |
| June 30, 2024 | $70.34 | 7.9% | 20.4% | Long | −12.3% | +5.8% |
| March 31, 2024 | $67.29 | 7.7% | 20.4% | Long | +4.5% | +4.4% |
| September 30, 2022 | $50.63 | 6.7% | -13.7% | Short | +51.5% | +7.6% |
| June 30, 2022 | $64.02 | 7.8% | -13.7% | Short | −20.9% | −4.9% |
| March 31, 2022 | $73.92 | 8.7% | -13.7% | Short | −13.4% | −16.1% |
| September 30, 2021 | $40.41 | 5.5% | -7.8% | Short | −12.3% | +11.1% |
| June 30, 2021 | $41.70 | 5.6% | -7.8% | Short | −3.1% | +0.6% |
| March 31, 2021 | $21.61 | 4.1% | -7.8% | Short | +93.0% | +8.4% |
| September 30, 2020 | $0.64 | 3.5% | 0.4% | No position | +28.8% | +12.1% |
| June 30, 2020 | $0.76 | 3.6% | 0.4% | No position | −15.8% | +9.0% |
| March 31, 2020 | $0.31 | 3.0% | 0.4% | No position | +145.2% | +20.2% |
How the test works
At each quarter end since March 2010 we rebuild the models from Precision Drilling Corp's quarters ending at least 90 days earlier (and no more than 200 days before that), using the figures as later filed, including any restatement, and value them at that day's close, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs so that price and share count are on the same basis. A wide enough gap is a long or a short for one quarter (growth 10 points; margin and return on equity 5 points; a PEG under 0.75 or over 3), measured on total return against the S&P 500. The rules were set before the test. No trading or borrowing costs; today's list of companies. Not investment advice. All companies and the results across them.
Compare with peers
- Seadrill Ltd priced in
- Borr Drilling Ltd priced in
- Noble Corp plc priced in
- Helmerich & Payne, Inc. priced in
- Patterson UTI Energy Inc priced in
Head to head: PDS vs SDRLBORR vs PDSNE vs PDS
More: Oil & Gas Drilling stocks compared, Energy sector, rankings of US companies