Outdoor Holding Co key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2026, Outdoor Holding Co had return on equity of -1.5% and a net margin of -6.9%. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2018Dec 2017 | 2019Mar 2019 | 2020Mar 2020 | 2021Mar 2021 | 2022Mar 2022 | 2023Mar 2023 | 2024Mar 2024 | 2025Mar 2025 | 2026Mar 2026 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | −447.1% | −256.5% | −98.5% | −12.5% | 10.8% | −13.9% | −30.8% | −264.8% | −6.9% | 12.1% |
| Return on equity | — | −73.1% | −59.7% | −8.7% | 9.6% | −2.3% | −4.5% | −45.1% | −1.5% | 2.8% |
| Return on assets | −117.7% | −48.3% | −34.4% | −7.1% | 8.7% | −2.1% | −4.1% | −37.4% | −1.3% | 2.4% |
| Effective tax rate | — | — | — | — | 7.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A as % of revenue | — | — | — | 24.2% | 19.3% | 78.4% | 90.2% | — | — | — |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $82m of assets due within a year against $17m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $82m short-term assets against $11m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt Cash or debt not separately reported. Not assessable.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Equity or debt not reported. Not assessable.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Five-year comparison not available. Not assessable.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt Cash flow or debt not reported. Not assessable.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Interest not separately reported. Not assessable.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Outdoor Holding's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 10 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Net income has been a median -18.1% of total assets over 10 years.
- Pricing power 3 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 31.2%, moving by 36.1 percentage points (standard deviation) across 8 years.
- Durability 10 / 20
Operating margin has been a median -17.8%; its worst year was -210.5%.
- Cash conversion 3 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 3 of 9 years, at a median -12.9% of revenue.
- Discipline 6 / 20
The diluted share count rose 158.3% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 4.9% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Medium. In this industry, AI could change how the product is made or sold, without replacing the core asset. The score above includes a 5-point deduction for that exposure (23 before it).
Compare with peers
- FST Corp. statistics
- Byrna Technologies Inc. statistics
- Interactive Strength, Inc. statistics
- Trugolf Holdings, Inc. statistics
- Jakks Pacific Inc statistics
Head to head: KBSX vs POWWBYRN vs POWWPOWW vs TRNR
More: Leisure Products stocks compared, Consumer Discretionary sector, rankings of US companies