Virtu Financial, Inc.: what the price is pricing in

The price implies earnings growth of -8.9% a year; our model expects 20.0%. That gap is wide enough for a long position this quarter. Switch lens below to see the same question asked of earnings, growth, sales and book value.

What growth in earnings is the price paying for?

The price implies earnings growth of -8.9% a year; our model expects 20.0%.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

What the price implies What our model expects

Quarters with a position2521 long, 4 short, since March 31, 2017

Beat the S&P 5009 of 2536.0% of quarters held

Strategy against the index−77.4%cumulative; worst fall -86.7%

$10,000 became$5,685S&P 500 bought and held: $32,110

Over time

The earnings growth the price-to-earnings ratio requires, against the growth our model assumes. Net income is already after interest, so it is valued at the return shareholders require, plus spare cash (none for banks and insurers, whose cash is funded by deposits and policies), with no debt subtracted.

Growth our model assumes Growth the P/E implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

StrategyS&P 500, buy and hold Hypothetical, before costs. The strategy holds the S&P 500 and only changes on a signal: it switches into VIRT in long quarters and adds a short of VIRT in short quarters. The gap between the lines is what the signal added or lost.

Skill or luck?

In plain English: Across 25 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 9, by −3.6% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	21	33.3%	−3.0%	−8.2%	−17.0%	-0.74	No reliable evidence
Shorts	4	50.0%	−6.8%	+0.9%	−39.8%	-0.42	Too few quarters
All positions	25	36.0%	−3.6%	−8.2%	−21.2%	-0.88	No reliable evidence

Each position is measured against the S&P 500 over the same quarter: a long earns the stock's return minus the index's, a short the index's minus the stock's. "A year" compounds the per-quarter results. Evidence: strong at a t-statistic of 2 or more, some from 1.5; "worse" when the result is that far below zero; one company's history is a small sample, so read these alongside the results across all companies.

Every quarter (35)

From	Price paid	Growth the P/E implies	Growth our model assumes	Position	VIRT	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$55.16	-8.9%	20.0%	Long	−1.8%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$59.57	-7.9%	20.0%	Long	−7.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$43.98	-10.6%	20.0%	Long	+36.1%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$33.32	-13.5%	13.0%	Long	+32.8%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$35.50	-11.6%	13.0%	Long	−5.5%	+2.7%
June 30, 2025	$44.79	-3.5%	12.9%	Long	−20.3%	+8.1%
March 31, 2025	$38.12	-3.7%	9.6%	Long	+18.2%	+10.8%
December 31, 2024	$35.68	2.0%	6.0%	No position	+7.6%	−4.3%
September 30, 2024	$30.46	-0.7%	5.4%	No position	+17.9%	+2.5%
June 30, 2024	$22.45	-0.6%	2.0%	No position	+36.7%	+5.8%
March 31, 2024	$20.52	-2.2%	2.0%	No position	+10.6%	+4.4%
December 31, 2023	$20.26	-4.3%	4.0%	No position	+2.7%	+10.4%
September 30, 2023	$17.27	-4.3%	4.0%	No position	+18.9%	+11.6%
June 30, 2023	$17.09	-10.6%	2.0%	Long	+2.4%	−3.2%
March 31, 2023	$18.90	-12.5%	4.0%	Long	−8.3%	+8.7%
December 31, 2022	$20.41	-15.0%	5.7%	Long	−6.2%	+7.5%
September 30, 2022	$20.77	-15.7%	5.1%	Long	−0.7%	+7.6%
June 30, 2022	$23.41	-11.9%	4.0%	Long	−10.3%	−4.9%
March 31, 2022	$37.22	-8.9%	4.0%	Long	−36.5%	−16.1%
December 31, 2021	$28.83	-12.9%	4.9%	Long	+30.0%	−4.6%
September 30, 2021	$24.43	-16.6%	11.6%	Long	+19.0%	+11.1%
June 30, 2021	$27.63	-18.1%	13.0%	Long	−10.7%	+0.6%
March 31, 2021	$31.05	-15.7%	13.0%	Long	−10.3%	+8.4%
December 31, 2020	$25.17	-15.4%	13.0%	Long	+24.4%	+6.3%
September 30, 2020	$23.01	-12.6%	13.0%	Long	+10.6%	+12.1%
June 30, 2020	$23.60	2.1%	13.0%	Long	−1.6%	+9.0%
December 31, 2019	$15.99	20.7%	6.0%	Short	+31.9%	−19.4%
September 30, 2019	$16.36	15.2%	4.0%	Short	−0.8%	+9.0%
June 30, 2019	$21.78	6.6%	4.8%	No position	−23.9%	+1.8%
March 31, 2019	$23.75	-8.9%	13.0%	Long	−7.3%	+4.2%
June 30, 2018	$26.55	-3.4%	13.0%	Long	−22.1%	+7.7%
March 31, 2018	$33.00	84.6%	13.0%	Short	−18.9%	+3.5%
September 30, 2017	$16.20	14.4%	4.0%	Short	+14.7%	+6.8%
June 30, 2017	$17.65	10.0%	4.0%	No position	−7.0%	+4.4%
March 31, 2017	$17.00	5.4%	4.0%	No position	+5.4%	+3.1%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

Is the price-to-earnings ratio cheap or dear for the growth delivered?

Virtu Financial, Inc. trades on 8.8 times earnings while its earnings per share grew 64.5% a year: a PEG of 0.14.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

PEG: under 0.75 cheap for the growth, over 3 expensive

Quarters with a position1111 long, 0 short, since June 30, 2020

Beat the S&P 5003 of 1127.3% of quarters held

Strategy against the index−23.6%cumulative; worst fall -49.1%

$10,000 became$10,133S&P 500 bought and held: $13,646

Over time

The P/E divided by the earnings-per-share growth delivered over three years. Under 0.75 the market pays little for the growth (long); over 3 it pays a lot (short).

EPS growth, 3 years (%) Price-to-earnings ratio (x) Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

Skill or luck?

In plain English: Across 11 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 3, by −1.3% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	11	27.3%	−1.3%	−8.2%	−9.3%	-0.25	No reliable evidence
Shorts	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
All positions	11	27.3%	−1.3%	−8.2%	−9.3%	-0.25	No reliable evidence

Every quarter (13)

From	Price paid	Price-to-earnings ratio (x)	EPS growth, 3 years (%)	Position	VIRT	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$55.16	8.8x	64.5%	Long	−1.8%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$59.57	9.3x	45.9%	Long	−7.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$43.98	8.0x	29.3%	Long	+36.1%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$33.32	6.7x	15.8%	Long	+32.8%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$35.50	7.5x	11.9%	Long	−5.5%	+2.7%
June 30, 2025	$44.79	12.0x	6.6%	No position	−20.3%	+8.1%
June 30, 2023	$17.09	7.9x	12.9%	Long	+2.4%	−3.2%
December 31, 2022	$20.41	6.1x	106.6%	Long	−6.2%	+7.5%
September 30, 2022	$20.77	5.9x	90.1%	Long	−0.7%	+7.6%
June 30, 2022	$23.41	7.4x	43.9%	Long	−10.3%	−4.9%
March 31, 2022	$37.22	8.8x	12.4%	Long	−36.5%	−16.1%
September 30, 2020	$23.01	7.1x	88.5%	Long	+10.6%	+12.1%
June 30, 2020	$23.60	16.7x	27.5%	Long	−1.6%	+9.0%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

What return on equity is the price paying for?

The price implies a return on equity of 18.0%; the company earned 33.6%.

Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter

What the price implies What the company delivered

Quarters with a position2819 long, 9 short, since March 31, 2017

Beat the S&P 50011 of 2839.3% of quarters held

Strategy against the index−94.2%cumulative; worst fall -96.4%

$10,000 became$1,472S&P 500 bought and held: $34,481

Over time

The return on equity that justifies the price-to-book ratio, (P/B)(r − g) + g with an 8.5% required return and 2.5% long-run growth, against the return the company delivered last year.

Return on equity delivered Return on equity the price implies Long quarter Short quarter. Lower panel: the share price at each quarter end, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs (the table below gives the price as traded).

$10,000 trading the gap vs the S&P 500

Skill or luck?

In plain English: Across 28 quarters with a position, this lens beat the S&P 500 in 11, by −4.6% a quarter on average. That could easily be chance. One company is a small sample: the results across all companies are the better guide.

Positions	Quarters	Beat the S&P 500	Average vs S&P 500, a quarter	Typical (median), a quarter	A year	Confidence (t)	Evidence
Longs	19	31.6%	−3.1%	−8.2%	−18.0%	-0.71	No reliable evidence
Shorts	9	55.6%	−7.7%	+5.6%	−57.0%	-0.64	No reliable evidence
All positions	28	39.3%	−4.6%	−6.7%	−33.4%	-0.96	No reliable evidence

Every quarter (36)

From	Price paid	Return on equity the price implies	Return on equity delivered	Position	VIRT	S&P 500
September 30, 2026 (open)	$55.16	18.0%	33.6%	Long	−1.8%	−0.8%
June 30, 2026	$59.57	20.2%	36.2%	Long	−7.1%	+2.4%
March 31, 2026	$43.98	16.7%	58.4%	Long	+36.1%	+15.1%
December 31, 2025	$33.32	14.2%	31.4%	Long	+32.8%	−4.4%
September 30, 2025	$35.50	15.4%	30.7%	Long	−5.5%	+2.7%
June 30, 2025	$44.79	20.1%	25.4%	Long	−20.3%	+8.1%
December 31, 2024	$35.68	17.7%	15.1%	No position	+7.6%	−4.3%
September 30, 2024	$30.46	15.6%	15.2%	No position	+17.9%	+2.5%
June 30, 2024	$22.45	12.4%	11.1%	No position	+36.7%	+5.8%
March 31, 2024	$20.52	11.7%	11.2%	No position	+10.6%	+4.4%
December 31, 2023	$20.26	11.5%	12.6%	No position	+2.7%	+10.4%
September 30, 2023	$17.27	10.2%	10.6%	No position	+18.9%	+11.6%
June 30, 2023	$17.09	10.2%	15.7%	Long	+2.4%	−3.2%
March 31, 2023	$18.90	10.9%	18.3%	Long	−8.3%	+8.7%
December 31, 2022	$20.41	11.8%	24.1%	Long	−6.2%	+7.5%
September 30, 2022	$20.77	11.9%	25.0%	Long	−0.7%	+7.6%
June 30, 2022	$23.41	13.7%	23.2%	Long	−10.3%	−4.9%
March 31, 2022	$37.22	18.7%	31.6%	Long	−36.5%	−16.1%
December 31, 2021	$28.83	16.1%	33.7%	Long	+30.0%	−4.6%
September 30, 2021	$24.43	13.8%	37.0%	Long	+19.0%	+11.1%
June 30, 2021	$27.63	15.0%	48.5%	Long	−10.7%	+0.6%
March 31, 2021	$31.05	18.2%	54.1%	Long	−10.3%	+8.4%
December 31, 2020	$25.17	15.9%	43.9%	Long	+24.4%	+6.3%
September 30, 2020	$23.01	15.5%	34.8%	Long	+10.6%	+12.1%
June 30, 2020	$23.60	17.8%	15.7%	No position	−1.6%	+9.0%
March 31, 2020	$20.82	18.3%	-5.9%	Short	+14.5%	+20.2%
December 31, 2019	$15.99	14.1%	4.1%	Short	+31.9%	−19.4%
September 30, 2019	$16.36	13.6%	5.2%	Short	−0.8%	+9.0%
June 30, 2019	$21.78	16.0%	10.6%	Short	−23.9%	+1.8%
March 31, 2019	$23.75	17.0%	30.8%	Long	−7.3%	+4.2%
June 30, 2018	$26.55	15.1%	30.2%	Long	−22.1%	+7.7%
March 31, 2018	$33.00	21.4%	0.6%	Short	−18.9%	+3.5%
December 31, 2017	$18.30	12.8%	-0.2%	Short	+81.8%	−1.0%
September 30, 2017	$16.20	30.5%	14.1%	Short	+14.7%	+6.8%
June 30, 2017	$17.65	32.0%	19.4%	Short	−7.0%	+4.4%
March 31, 2017	$17.00	29.9%	23.9%	Short	+5.4%	+3.1%

Price paid: the closing price that day as traded, before any later share split.

How the test works

At each quarter end since March 2010 we rebuild the models from Virtu Financial, Inc.'s quarters ending at least 90 days earlier (and no more than 200 days before that), using the figures as later filed, including any restatement, and value them at that day's close, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs so that price and share count are on the same basis. A wide enough gap is a long or a short for one quarter (growth 10 points; margin and return on equity 5 points; a PEG under 0.75 or over 3), measured on total return against the S&P 500. The rules were set before the test. No trading or borrowing costs; today's list of companies. Not investment advice. All companies and the results across them.

Compare with peers

Head to head: EVR vs VIRT LAZ vs VIRT BGC vs VIRT HOOD vs VIRT

More: Investment Banking & Brokerage stocks compared, Financials sector, rankings of US companies

Figures from Virtu Financial, Inc.'s SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q), retrieved October 20, 2026. How we read and check them: methodology and data sources. Not investment advice. Back to Virtu Financial, Inc.