undamentalytics Newsletter

Profrac Holding vs Enerflex

Enerflex is the larger business, with $2.57bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.94bn for Profrac Holding (1.3 times as much). Enerflex grew faster (6.5% against -11.4%). Enerflex kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 2.5% against -19.0%. Enerflex carries less debt relative to equity (53.2% against 146.1%).

Latest fiscal yearProfrac HoldingACDC, 2025EnerflexEFXT, 2025
Revenue $1.94bn $2.57bn
Revenue growth -11.4% 6.5%
Net income −$369m $64.0m
Operating margin -11.6% 11.9%
Net margin -19.0% 2.5%
Return on equity -42.8% 6.0%
Free cash flow $19.6m $326m
Cash $22.9m $81.0m
Total debt $1.05bn $582m
Debt to equity 146.1% 53.2%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees — —
Market value $767m $2.88bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range —
Moat score 30 (Weak) —
Insider trades, 12 months 10 buys, 0 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.