Albany International vs Columbus Mckinnon
Albany International and Columbus Mckinnon are similar in size: $1.18bn and $1.19bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Columbus Mckinnon grew faster (23.9% against -3.9%). Albany International kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -4.8% against -19.2%. Albany International carries less debt relative to equity (62.7% against 165.2%).
| Latest fiscal year | Albany InternationalAIN, 2025 | Columbus MckinnonCMCO, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.18bn | $1.19bn |
| Revenue growth | -3.9% | 23.9% |
| Net income | −$57.3m | −$230m |
| Operating margin | -3.1% | -10.0% |
| Net margin | -4.8% | -19.2% |
| Return on equity | -6.9% | -19.7% |
| Free cash flow | $82.6m | −$164m |
| Cash | $112m | $96.6m |
| Total debt | $456m | $2.39bn |
| Debt to equity | 62.7% | 165.2% |
| Dividend per share | $1.09 | $0.28 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.8% |
| Share buybacks | $186m | $0 |
| Employees | 5,700 | 7,300 |
| Market value | $2.11bn | $528m |
| Price vs our value range | — | — |
| Moat score | 63 (Moderate) | 37 (Weak) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 1 buys, 0 sales | 2 buys, 5 sales |