Columbus Mckinnon vs Park Ohio Holdings
Park Ohio Holdings is the larger business, with $1.60bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.19bn for Columbus Mckinnon (1.3 times as much). Columbus Mckinnon grew faster (23.9% against -3.4%). Park Ohio Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 1.5% against -19.2%. Columbus Mckinnon carries less debt relative to equity (165.2% against 166.9%).
| Latest fiscal year | Columbus MckinnonCMCO, 2026 | Park Ohio HoldingsPKOH, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.19bn | $1.60bn |
| Revenue growth | 23.9% | -3.4% |
| Net income | −$230m | $23.8m |
| Operating margin | -10.0% | 4.1% |
| Net margin | -19.2% | 1.5% |
| Return on equity | -19.7% | 6.7% |
| Free cash flow | −$164m | $2.0m |
| Cash | $96.6m | $44.8m |
| Total debt | $2.39bn | $636m |
| Debt to equity | 165.2% | 166.9% |
| Dividend per share | $0.28 | $0.50 |
| Dividend yield | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Share buybacks | $0 | — |
| Employees | 7,300 | 6,300 |
| Market value | $528m | $626m |
| Price vs our value range | — | — |
| Moat score | 37 (Weak) | 32 (Weak) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 2 buys, 5 sales | 1 buys, 321 sales |