Concrete Pumping Holdings vs Shimmick
Shimmick is the larger business, with $493m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $393m for Concrete Pumping Holdings (1.3 times as much). Shimmick grew faster (2.6% against -7.7%). Concrete Pumping Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 1.6% against -5.2%.
| Latest fiscal year | Concrete Pumping HoldingsBBCP, 2025 | ShimmickSHIM, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $393m | $493m |
| Revenue growth | -7.7% | 2.6% |
| Net income | $6.4m | −$25.6m |
| Operating margin | 10.6% | -3.9% |
| Net margin | 1.6% | -5.2% |
| Return on equity | 2.2% | — |
| Free cash flow | $17.5m | −$71.5m |
| Cash | $44.4m | $20.0m |
| Total debt | $425m | $64.5m |
| Debt to equity | 160.5% | — |
| Dividend per share | — | — |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Share buybacks | $14.2m | — |
| Employees | 1,530 | 971 |
| Market value | $532m | $106m |
| Price vs our value range | Within our value range | — |
| Moat score | 39 (Weak) | — |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 6 sales | 0 buys, 1 sales |