Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. had return on equity of 2.2%, an operating margin of 10.6%, debt equal to 160.5% of equity and a current ratio of 2.17. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2018Oct 2018 | 2020Oct 2020 | 2021Oct 2021 | 2022Oct 2022 | 2023Oct 2023 | 2024Oct 2024 | 2025Oct 2025 | LTMJul 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.7% | 45.1% | 43.6% | 40.8% | 40.3% | 38.9% | 38.5% | 38.3% |
| Operating margin | 16.4% | −10.4% | 12.0% | 12.5% | 13.9% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 11.5% |
| Net margin | 11.7% | −20.1% | −4.8% | 7.1% | 7.2% | 3.8% | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | 3.2% | 13.0% | 4.1% | −6.3% | 9.6% | 10.1% | 4.5% | 3.7% |
| Return on equity | 61.7% | −39.1% | −5.7% | 10.6% | 10.8% | 5.1% | 2.2% | 3.9% |
| Return on assets | 7.7% | −10.7% | −1.9% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 0.7% | 1.2% |
| Asset turnover | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.47 |
| Current ratio | 0.59 | 0.96 | 1.40 | 0.74 | 1.12 | 1.99 | 2.17 | 1.71 |
| Debt to equity | 513.8% | 144.4% | 162.7% | 152.9% | 127.8% | 116.6% | 160.5% | 158.7% |
| Interest cover (operating income ÷ interest) | 1.9x | n/m | 1.5x | 1.9x | 2.2x | 1.9x | 1.3x | 1.4x |
| Effective tax rate | — | — | — | 16.2% | 21.6% | 33.3% | 36.6% | 35.0% |
| Capital spending as % of revenue | 13.0% | 12.9% | 19.9% | 25.4% | 12.3% | 10.3% | 11.9% | 12.4% |
| Free cash flow ÷ net income | 27.8% | — | — | −88.0% | 133.3% | 265.9% | 275.0% | 150.5% |
| Dividends ÷ net income | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | 833.7% | — |
| Dividends and buybacks ÷ free cash flow | — | 0.3% | 2.5% | — | 24.8% | 23.6% | 384.0% | 58.6% |
| Quarter | 2024 Q4Oct 2024 | 2025 Q1Jan 2025 | 2025 Q2Apr 2025 | 2025 Q3Jul 2025 | 2025 Q4Oct 2025 | 2026 Q1Jan 2026 | 2026 Q2Apr 2026 | 2026 Q3Jul 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.5% | 36.1% | 38.5% | 39.0% | 39.8% | 35.3% | 38.6% | 38.7% |
| Operating margin | 17.2% | 4.0% | 8.8% | 12.5% | 15.5% | 5.0% | 11.3% | 12.9% |
| Net margin | 8.5% | −3.1% | −0.0% | 3.6% | 4.9% | −2.7% | 2.4% | 4.2% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | 14.4% | 0.2% | 11.8% | 4.2% | 1.8% | 13.1% | −1.8% | 3.2% |
| Current ratio | 1.99 | 1.51 | 1.79 | 1.75 | 2.17 | 1.96 | 1.73 | 1.71 |
| Debt to equity | 116.0% | 160.0% | 159.4% | 159.8% | 157.8% | 159.2% | 159.3% | 156.3% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $128m of assets due within a year against $75m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $128m short-term assets against $540m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt $43m of cash against $419m of debt.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 156% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Debt to equity moved from 140% to 156% over five years.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt $68m of operating cash flow against $419m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of $49m against $35m of interest.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Concrete Pumping Holdings's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 7 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Net income has been a median 1.2% of total assets over 7 years.
- Pricing power 14 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 40.7%, moving by 2.6 percentage points (standard deviation) across 7 years.
- Durability 3 / 20
Operating margin has been a median 11.4%; its worst year was -8.3%.
- Cash conversion 13 / 20
Free cash flow was positive in 6 of 7 years, at a median 8.0% of revenue.
- Discipline 10 / 20
The diluted share count rose 538.8% over five years; stock-based pay has been a median 0.9% of revenue.
AI disruption exposure: Low. In this industry, the business rests on physical assets, regulated networks or products AI itself depends on.
Compare with peers
- Shimmick Corp statistics
- Energy Services Of America Corp statistics
- Southland Holdings, Inc. statistics
- Limbach Holdings, Inc. statistics
- Cadeler A/s statistics
Head to head: BBCP vs SHIMBBCP vs ESOABBCP vs SLND
More: Construction & Engineering stocks compared, Industrials sector, rankings of US companies