undamentalytics Newsletter

Curtiss Wright vs Leonardo DRS

Curtiss Wright and Leonardo DRS are similar in size: $3.50bn and $3.65bn of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Leonardo DRS grew faster (12.8% against 12.1%). Curtiss Wright kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 13.8% against 7.6%. Leonardo DRS carries less debt relative to equity (12.9% against 37.8%).

Latest fiscal yearCurtiss WrightCW, 2025Leonardo DRSDRS, 2025
Revenue $3.50bn $3.65bn
Revenue growth 12.1% 12.8%
Net income $484m $278m
Operating margin 18.1% 9.5%
Net margin 13.8% 7.6%
Return on equity 19.4% 10.5%
Free cash flow $554m $227m
Cash $371m $647m
Total debt $958m $353m
Debt to equity 37.8% 12.9%
Dividend per share $0.93 —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks $465m $35.0m
Employees — 6,400
Market value $18.39bn $10.38bn
Price vs our value range Within our value range Within our value range
Moat score 75 (Strong) 48 (Moderate)
Insider trades, 12 months 1 buys, 31 sales 1 buys, 22 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.