FBS Global vs Powerbank
FBS Global and Powerbank are similar in size: $19.8m and $19.8m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. FBS Global grew faster (91.0% against -33.4%). FBS Global kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -7.9% against -88.5%. FBS Global carries less debt relative to equity (1.1% against 328.4%).
| Latest fiscal year | FBS GlobalFBGL, 2025 | PowerbankPBK, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.8m | $19.8m |
| Revenue growth | 91.0% | -33.4% |
| Net income | −$1.6m | −$17.6m |
| Operating margin | -7.5% | -82.6% |
| Net margin | -7.9% | -88.5% |
| Return on equity | -23.6% | -124.7% |
| Free cash flow | −$3.2m | −$9.3m |
| Cash | $4.1m | $7.6m |
| Total debt | $112,436 | $46.0m |
| Debt to equity | 1.1% | 328.4% |
| Dividend per share | — | — |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Share buybacks | — | — |
| Employees | — | — |
| Market value | $29.6m | $6.5m |
| Price vs our value range | — | — |
| Moat score | — | — |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 0 sales | 0 buys, 0 sales |