undamentalytics Newsletter

Megan Holdings vs Powerbank

Megan Holdings and Powerbank are similar in size: $19.6m and $19.8m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. Megan Holdings grew faster (48.5% against -33.4%). Megan Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 1.0% against -88.5%. Megan Holdings carries less debt relative to equity (0.8% against 328.4%).

Latest fiscal yearMegan HoldingsMGN, 2025PowerbankPBK, 2026
Revenue $19.6m $19.8m
Revenue growth 48.5% -33.4%
Net income $205,596 −$17.6m
Operating margin 0.7% -82.6%
Net margin 1.0% -88.5%
Return on equity 2.1% -124.7%
Free cash flow −$2.2m −$9.3m
Cash $42,412 $7.6m
Total debt $96,983 $46.0m
Debt to equity 0.8% 328.4%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees — —
Market value $58.7m $6.5m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — —
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.