undamentalytics Newsletter

FBS Global vs Megan Holdings

FBS Global and Megan Holdings are similar in size: $19.8m and $19.6m of revenue in their latest fiscal years. FBS Global grew faster (91.0% against 48.5%). Megan Holdings kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 1.0% against -7.9%. Megan Holdings carries less debt relative to equity (0.8% against 1.1%).

Latest fiscal yearFBS GlobalFBGL, 2025Megan HoldingsMGN, 2025
Revenue $19.8m $19.6m
Revenue growth 91.0% 48.5%
Net income −$1.6m $205,596
Operating margin -7.5% 0.7%
Net margin -7.9% 1.0%
Return on equity -23.6% 2.1%
Free cash flow −$3.2m −$2.2m
Cash $4.1m $42,412
Total debt $112,436 $96,983
Debt to equity 1.1% 0.8%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees — —
Market value $29.6m $58.7m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score — —
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.