undamentalytics Newsletter

Hamilton Beach Brands Holding vs Sharkninja

Sharkninja is the larger business, with $6.40bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $607m for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding (10.5 times as much). Sharkninja grew faster (15.7% against -7.3%). Sharkninja kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 11.0% against 4.4%. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding carries less debt relative to equity (27.3% against 27.6%).

Latest fiscal yearHamilton Beach Brands HoldingHBB, 2025SharkninjaSN, 2025
Revenue $607m $6.40bn
Revenue growth -7.3% 15.7%
Net income $26.5m $701m
Operating margin 6.0% 14.4%
Net margin 4.4% 11.0%
Return on equity 15.2% 30.4%
Free cash flow $11.0m $488m
Cash $47.3m $777m
Total debt $50.0m $739m
Debt to equity 27.3% 27.6%
Dividend per share $0.47 —
Dividend yield 1.5% —
Share buybacks $9.0m —
Employees 660 —
Market value $443m $29.07bn
Price vs our value range Below our value range —
Moat score 46 (Moderate) —
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 1 sales 0 buys, 28 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.