Sharkninja vs Whirlpool
Whirlpool is the larger business, with $15.52bn of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $6.40bn for Sharkninja (2.4 times as much). Sharkninja grew faster (15.7% against -6.5%). Sharkninja kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of 11.0% against 2.0%. Sharkninja carries less debt relative to equity (27.6% against 239.2%).
| Latest fiscal year | SharkninjaSN, 2025 | WhirlpoolWHR, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.40bn | $15.52bn |
| Revenue growth | 15.7% | -6.5% |
| Net income | $701m | $318m |
| Operating margin | 14.4% | 5.4% |
| Net margin | 11.0% | 2.0% |
| Return on equity | 30.4% | 11.8% |
| Free cash flow | $488m | $81.0m |
| Cash | $777m | $669m |
| Total debt | $739m | $6.52bn |
| Debt to equity | 27.6% | 239.2% |
| Dividend per share | — | $5.30 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.4% |
| Share buybacks | — | $0 |
| Employees | — | 41,000 |
| Market value | $29.07bn | $1.98bn |
| Price vs our value range | — | — |
| Moat score | — | 39 (Weak) |
| Insider trades, 12 months | 0 buys, 28 sales | 1 buys, 0 sales |