undamentalytics Newsletter

Microvision vs WF Holding

WF Holding is the larger business, with $7.4m of revenue in fiscal 2025 against $1.2m for Microvision (6.1 times as much). WF Holding grew faster (61.9% against -74.3%). WF Holding kept more of each dollar of sales as profit: a net margin of -64.4% against -7862.7%. WF Holding carries less debt relative to equity (4.0% against 69.2%).

Latest fiscal yearMicrovisionMVIS, 2025WF HoldingWFF, 2025
Revenue $1.2m $7.4m
Revenue growth -74.3% 61.9%
Net income −$95.0m −$4.8m
Operating margin -6856.6% -20.5%
Net margin -7862.7% -64.4%
Return on equity -182.1% -127.3%
Free cash flow −$59.4m −$2.7m
Cash $32.4m $2.3m
Total debt $38.4m $188,689
Debt to equity 69.2% 4.0%
Dividend per share — —
Dividend yield — —
Share buybacks — —
Employees — —
Market value $43.0m $6.6m
Price vs our value range — —
Moat score 5 (Weak) —
Insider trades, 12 months 0 buys, 0 sales 0 buys, 0 sales

Each figure is from the company's latest annual report and links to the page it comes from. Fiscal years can end on different dates. Market value and the value verdict use the delayed price shown on the stock pages. Not a recommendation.

Go deeper

Figures from each company's latest annual report filed with the SEC (10-K or 20-F), as reported, with the fiscal year shown. Not investment advice. How we read filings: methodology.