Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. key statistics and ratios
In fiscal 2025, Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. had return on equity of -68.7%, an operating margin of -42.5%, debt equal to 50.2% of equity and a current ratio of 0.21. Each ratio below is calculated from the figures on its income statement, balance sheet and cash flow pages.
Financial ratios
| Fiscal year | 2017Dec 2017 | 2018Dec 2018 | 2019Dec 2019 | 2020Dec 2020 | 2021Dec 2021 | 2022Dec 2022 | 2023Dec 2023 | 2024Dec 2024 | 2025Dec 2025 | LTMJun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 99.8% | 94.9% | — | 81.6% | 35.3% | 36.6% | 40.6% | 39.0% | 25.4% | 31.6% |
| Operating margin | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | −36.2% | −32.0% | −54.7% | −102.8% | −42.5% | −25.1% |
| Net margin | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | −20.2% | −103.1% | −75.5% | −71.8% | −46.3% | −27.7% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | — | <−999% | — | — | −33.4% | −25.1% | −10.1% | −51.8% | −12.8% | −3.5% |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −147.2% | −68.7% | −71.1% |
| Return on assets | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | <−999% | −8.5% | −88.0% | −61.3% | −43.7% | −36.5% | −31.1% |
| Asset turnover | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 1.12 |
| Current ratio | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Debt to equity | — | — | — | — | — | 45.6% | — | 39.1% | 50.2% | 58.6% |
| Interest cover (operating income ÷ interest) | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m |
| Capital spending as % of revenue | — | 20.4% | — | — | 2.7% | 17.5% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Quarter | 2024 Q3Sept 2024 | 2024 Q4Dec 2024 | 2025 Q1Mar 2025 | 2025 Q2Jun 2025 | 2025 Q3Sept 2025 | 2025 Q4Dec 2025 | 2026 Q1Mar 2026 | 2026 Q2Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.7% | 46.2% | 47.5% | 19.2% | 27.6% | 17.8% | 41.9% | 37.9% |
| Operating margin | −52.2% | −214.3% | −52.9% | −42.3% | −38.8% | −40.8% | −6.6% | −17.8% |
| Net margin | −56.4% | −218.2% | −63.6% | −44.7% | −41.6% | −43.1% | −9.2% | −20.3% |
| Free-cash-flow margin | — | — | −59.6% | 6.0% | — | — | 7.7% | −2.3% |
| Current ratio | 1.52 | 0.36 | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Debt to equity | 13.7% | 39.1% | 31.1% | 36.4% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 52.0% | 58.6% |
Financial health
- Short-term assets cover short-term liabilities $7m of assets due within a year against $30m of liabilities due within a year.
- Short-term assets cover long-term liabilities $7m short-term assets against $2m of longer-dated liabilities.
- More cash than debt Cash or debt not separately reported. Not assessable.
- Debt below 40% of shareholders' equity Debt is 59% of equity.
- Debt burden no higher than five years ago Five-year comparison not available. Not assessable.
- A year's operating cash flow covers at least 20% of debt −$2m of operating cash flow against $12m of debt.
- Operating profit covers interest at least five times over Operating income of −$15m against $2m of interest.
Moat
Weak moat
How hard Greenwave Technology Solutions's competitive advantage looks for rivals to wear away, judged from 10 years of its own filings: returns on capital, pricing power, profit durability, cash conversion and discipline.
- Returns on capital 0 / 20
Net income has been a median -67.9% of total assets over 10 years.
- Pricing power 13 / 20
Gross margin has been a median 37.0%, moving by 2.6 percentage points (standard deviation) across 5 years.
- Durability 10 / 20
Operating margin has been a median -84.6%; its worst year was -43203.4%.
AI disruption exposure: Medium. In this industry, AI could change how the product is made or sold, without replacing the core asset. The score above includes a 5-point deduction for that exposure (38 before it).
Compare with peers
- Capstone Holding Corp. statistics
- Redcloud Holdings plc statistics
- Hyperscale Data, Inc. statistics
- Hudson Technologies Inc statistics
- Euro Tech Holdings Co LTD statistics
Head to head: CAPS vs GWAVGWAV vs RCTGPUS vs GWAV
More: Trading Companies & Distributors stocks compared, Industrials sector, rankings of US companies