Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands: what the price is pricing in
The price implies cash-flow growth of -21.2% a year; our model expects 13.8%. That gap is wide enough for a long position this quarter. Switch lens below to see the same question asked of earnings, growth, sales and book value.
No published rating for Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands: data-quality checks not passed. The readings below run our models backwards for research and show how trading the gap would have done; they are not a valuation or a rating. The valuation page shows the models and their status.
What growth in cash flow is the price paying for?
The price implies cash-flow growth of -21.2% a year; our model expects 13.8%.
Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter
Over time
Skill or luck?
In plain English: With only 2 quarters of positions, Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands's own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
| Shorts | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| All positions | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
Every quarter (3)
| From | Price paid | Growth the price implies | Growth our model assumes | Position | IMPP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $5.11 | -21.2% | 13.8% | Long | −8.6% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $4.61 | -23.0% | 13.8% | Long | +10.8% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $4.28 | -24.4% | 13.8% | Long | +7.7% | +15.1% |
What growth in earnings is the price paying for?
The price implies earnings growth of -24.3% a year; our model expects 13.8%.
Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter
Over time
Skill or luck?
In plain English: With only 2 quarters of positions, Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands's own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
| Shorts | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| All positions | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
Every quarter (3)
| From | Price paid | Growth the P/E implies | Growth our model assumes | Position | IMPP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $5.11 | -24.3% | 13.8% | Long | −8.6% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $4.61 | -26.1% | 13.8% | Long | +10.8% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $4.28 | -27.5% | 13.8% | Long | +7.7% | +15.1% |
What profit margin is the price paying for?
The price implies an owner-earnings margin of 3.5%; the company has kept 26.0%.
Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter
Over time
Skill or luck?
In plain English: With only 2 quarters of positions, Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands's own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
| Shorts | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| All positions | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
Every quarter (3)
| From | Price paid | Margin the price implies | Margin delivered | Position | IMPP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $5.11 | 3.5% | 26.0% | Long | −8.6% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $4.61 | 3.1% | 26.0% | Long | +10.8% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $4.28 | 2.9% | 26.0% | Long | +7.7% | +15.1% |
What return on equity is the price paying for?
The price implies a return on equity of 4.6%; the company earned 10.5%.
Market more pessimistic than our model: long this quarter
Over time
Skill or luck?
In plain English: With only 2 quarters of positions, Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands's own record is too short to tell skill from luck. The results across all companies on the priced-in page are the better guide.
| Positions | Quarters | Beat the S&P 500 | Average vs S&P 500, a quarter | Typical (median), a quarter | A year | Confidence (t) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longs | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
| Shorts | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| All positions | 2 | 50.0% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.9% | — | Too few quarters |
Every quarter (3)
| From | Price paid | Return on equity the price implies | Return on equity delivered | Position | IMPP | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2026 (open) | $5.11 | 4.6% | 10.5% | Long | −8.6% | −0.8% |
| June 30, 2026 | $4.61 | 4.4% | 10.5% | Long | +10.8% | +2.4% |
| March 31, 2026 | $4.28 | 4.3% | 10.5% | Long | +7.7% | +15.1% |
How the test works
At each quarter end since March 2010 we rebuild the models from Imperial Petroleum Inc./marshall Islands's quarters ending at least 90 days earlier (and no more than 200 days before that), using the figures as later filed, including any restatement, and value them at that day's close, adjusted for later share splits and spin-offs so that price and share count are on the same basis. A wide enough gap is a long or a short for one quarter (growth 10 points; margin and return on equity 5 points; a PEG under 0.75 or over 3), measured on total return against the S&P 500. The rules were set before the test. No trading or borrowing costs; today's list of companies. Not investment advice. All companies and the results across them.
Compare with peers
- Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. priced in
- Stealthgas Inc. priced in
- Himalaya Shipping Ltd. priced in
- Seacor Marine Holdings Inc. priced in
- Diana Shipping Inc. priced in
Head to head: IMPP vs SHIPGASS vs IMPPHSHP vs IMPP
More: Marine Transportation stocks compared, Industrials sector, rankings of US companies